Consumer Price Index: Inflation rose less than expected in May

We have a new read on inflation. The Consumer Price Index is lower than what the markets were expecting.

The Index for May increased by a tenth of a percent, and the markets were expecting a two-tenths of a percent increase. Over the last year, inflation has increased 2.4 percent, which is right in line with expectations.

Increases in shelter costs were the main driver in this month’s report.

Related Stories
Farmers still earn only a small share of consumer food spending, even as post-farm costs continue to take most of the dollar.
Kansas Congressman Derek Schmidt joins us to discuss House passage of the Farm Bill, its potential impact on farm profitability and stability, key policy compromises, and the outlook for Senate consideration.
A more independent UAE could add long-term pressure and volatility to energy markets, affecting fuel and fertilizer costs.
Food inflation is still building in 2026, with beef leading pressure while eggs and dairy offer some relief.
Fuel costs are shaping food and demand patterns.
A prolonged Iran ceasefire offers limited relief as fertilizer concerns persist, prompting U.S. policy shifts and driving farmers to reconsider crop acreage.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Fertilizer markets face uncertainty after President Trump raised the possibility of tariffs on Canadian imports, with analysts warning of supply and pricing risks. Josh Linville with StoneX provides a fertilizer industry outlook.
Frigid winter weather and rapid temperature swings have cattle markets watching closely for livestock stress, as analysts say fluctuations pose the greatest risk.
A new study found that retaining the EPA’s half-RIN credit protects soybean demand, farm income, and crushing-sector strength while preserving biofuel market flexibility.
The U.S. has a bountiful corn supply, but markets are waiting for the January WASDE Report, which will include updated yield estimates.
Rising federal debt is increasing pressure on Washington to limit spending, which could tighten future funding and delivery for agricultural programs.