On and off-farm data is imperative, but how much can it provide?

In today’s digital age, it is all about the data. Extension specialists say it is valuable information both on and off the farm.

“Well, it’s extremely valuable data. It’s very valuable data, because a farmer can decide, I don’t need to put as much pesticide in this area and therefore helping to protect the groundwater and surface water, and so it has lots of benefits from that, but the greater value in that is the companies that provided this, whether it’s the seed, the fertilizer, the feed, whatever they provided, they’re gathering that data through the smart devices. They’re aggregating with a bunch of farms, and the good purpose is they’re trying to provide you with better products and services as a farmer. The part that’s not quite so fair is they’re creating all this data that they can then sell to third parties, and they’re making a lot of money off of it, and in some cases, it’s being sold to hedge funds that are then competing with farmers for the purchase of land,” said Bill Oemichen.

However, he says it is those off the farm that have him concerned, pointing to companies that sell your information.

“The part that’s not quite so fair is they’re creating all this data that they can then sell to third parties, and they’re making a lot of money off of it, and in some cases, it’s being sold to hedge funds that are then competing with farmers for the purchase of land.”

He says it is important to do your research when signing up for anything digital and to always read and understand the terms of service.

Related Stories
A court decision that overturns Enlist labels would remove two major herbicides from use and reshape EPA’s future mitigation policies for other pesticides.
Pasture, Rangeland and Forage (PRF) interval selection—not just participation—drives protection levels as rainfall patterns become less predictable across the South.
If the House concurs and the President signs, USDA services and farm-bill programs resume at full speed with authorities extended for another year.
Experts highlight the importance of monitoring insecticide resistance in crops and improving disease traceability at livestock shows through RFID technology.
Lewie Pugh, with the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report to share his perspective on what the bill could mean for truckers.
Ohio AgNet’s Dusty Sonnenberg takes us up in the cab with a popcorn farmer bringing in this year’s haul.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Lewis Williamson with HTS Commodities shares an update on post-WASDE grain movement, with corn leading export momentum, soybeans steady, and wheat and sorghum continuing to move selectively.
China still has a long way to go before it meets its commitment to buy 12 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans this year.
The new WOTUS proposal narrows federal jurisdiction, restores key agricultural exclusions, and gives farmers clearer permitting rules after years of regulatory uncertainty.
UMN Extension’s Emily Krekelberg outlines today’s top farm stressors, key signs of mental health distress in rural communities, and the resources available for support.
National Pork Board Chief Sustainability Officer Jamie Burr shares a closer look at the Pork Checkoff’s Pork Cares Farm Impact Report, a research program to increase trust in the pork supply chain.
Brooks York with Agrisompo joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report with some guidance on how producers can navigate their crop insurance claims for unsold grain crops.