Tariff Revenue Debate Raises Questions for Farmers

Tariff revenues rarely flow directly back to farmers.

frozen funds usda money farm programs_Photo by ivandanru via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo by ivandanru via Adobe Stock

Adobe Stock

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD NEWS) — Questions are growing about how tariff revenue is used and whether farmers benefit, as trade policy again reshapes agricultural markets and federal spending priorities.

Dr. Bart Fischer of the Agricultural and Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University notes tariff revenue flows through longstanding statutory channels rooted in the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1935. Section 32 requires 30 percent of customs duties to be directed toward agricultural priorities, including export promotion, domestic consumption support, and the restoration of farmers’ purchasing power.

Tariff collections have climbed sharply. Customs duties rose from $34.6 billion in 2017 to $70.8 billion in 2019, and the Congressional Budget Office projects duties could jump from $77 billion in 2024 to about $418 billion by 2026 under expanded tariff use.

In practice, most Section 32 funds support nutrition programs rather than direct farm payments. USDA retains limited authority for commodity purchases and assistance, while appropriations rules cap farmer-directed support at roughly $350 million in carryover funds annually — a small share if 2026 projections hold.

The structure leaves policymakers relying on tools like Commodity Credit Corporation programs for farm relief despite rising tariff revenues.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Tariff revenues rarely flow directly back to farmers.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist
Related Stories
Seafood producers gain expanded access to USDA support programs.
Lawmakers say payments will support schools, infrastructure and public safety in rural communities.
Risk management and diversification improve survival odds. Heidi Exline with American Farmland Trust discusses barriers to farmland access and efforts to connect the next generation of producers with retiring farmers.
The analysis models how trade disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz may continue to drive up the cost of fertilizer.
National Land Realty’s Jeramy Stephens explains how rising input costs and economic uncertainty are impacting the farmland market and what landowners should watch moving forward.
Higher fuel costs are raising grain shipping expenses. RealAg Radio’s Shaun Haney discusses how energy market disruptions are impacting farmers in new ways as the War in Iran continues.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Coal-based ethanol could weaken long-term export demand for corn-based fuels.
Data centers may compete with farms for key resources.
New wage rules improve accuracy but may still raise labor costs.
Strong corn and China-driven demand support the pace of U.S. grain exports. RealAg Radio host Shaun Haney discusses Canada-China agricultural trade talks.
Tight global supply is likely to keep fuel and fertilizer costs elevated.
Improving dairy prices could support stronger milk checks later this year.