Tariff Revenue Debate Raises Questions for Farmers

Tariff revenues rarely flow directly back to farmers.

frozen funds usda money farm programs_Photo by ivandanru via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo by ivandanru via Adobe Stock

Adobe Stock

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD NEWS) — Questions are growing about how tariff revenue is used and whether farmers benefit, as trade policy again reshapes agricultural markets and federal spending priorities.

Dr. Bart Fischer of the Agricultural and Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University notes tariff revenue flows through longstanding statutory channels rooted in the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1935. Section 32 requires 30 percent of customs duties to be directed toward agricultural priorities, including export promotion, domestic consumption support, and the restoration of farmers’ purchasing power.

Tariff collections have climbed sharply. Customs duties rose from $34.6 billion in 2017 to $70.8 billion in 2019, and the Congressional Budget Office projects duties could jump from $77 billion in 2024 to about $418 billion by 2026 under expanded tariff use.

In practice, most Section 32 funds support nutrition programs rather than direct farm payments. USDA retains limited authority for commodity purchases and assistance, while appropriations rules cap farmer-directed support at roughly $350 million in carryover funds annually — a small share if 2026 projections hold.

The structure leaves policymakers relying on tools like Commodity Credit Corporation programs for farm relief despite rising tariff revenues.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Tariff revenues rarely flow directly back to farmers.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist
Related Stories
The Fertilizer Research Act, reintroduced by Sens. Grassley, Ernst, and Baldwin, would direct the USDA to study and publish public reports on competition and pricing trends in the fertilizer market.
Allowing year-round sales of E15 nationally could deliver billions in economic gains, according to a new study from the Renewable Fuels Association and National Corn Growers Association.
U.S. aquaculture may gain competitive ground as harmful subsidies are phased out abroad, but producers should monitor shifts in import supply chains and trade enforcement closely.
Farmers await concrete trade commitments from China. Until then, export prospects for soybeans, corn, and sorghum remain uncertain against strong South American competition.
U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins today issued a new memorandum to modernize and strengthen America’s wildfire prevention and response system.
Understanding the Big, Beautiful Bill’s complex impact on SNAP benefits – that’s the topic of today’s Firm to Farm blog post by RFD-TV’s legal expert, Roger McEowen.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Corn and sorghum exports continue outperforming soybeans.
Expanding supplies are weighing on global coffee and cocoa prices.
Lewis Williamson with HTS Commodities discusses how tensions in the Middle East are impacting producer’s spring planting decisions.
Land values remain key to borrowing strength.
Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition discusses supply chain disruptions, rising costs, and the potential impact on agriculture as farmers navigate ongoing global uncertainty.
Strong exports support ethanol margins and corn demand.