The Future of Trucking: New Legislation Proposes Lowering CDL Age Requirement to 18

Lewie Pugh, EVP of OOIDA, discusses how lowering the age for commercial driver’s licenses (CDL) to 18 could rejuvenate the trucking labor market.

GRAIN VALLEY, Mo. (RFD-TV) — A new bill in Congress aims to lower the minimum age for commercial truck drivers to 18, a move supporters say could help attract a new generation to the industry. But not everyone agrees that it’s the right approach.

Lewie Pugh, Executive Vice President of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report to discuss the proposal and share the association’s perspective on the issue.

In his interview with RFD-TV News, Pugh explained that while proponents cite a driver shortage, OOIDA views the problem as more of a retention issue rather than a lack of available drivers. He emphasized that many truckers leave the profession due to low pay, poor working conditions, and extended time away from home—factors that younger drivers would also face.

Pugh also expressed safety concerns, noting that allowing 18-year-olds to drive across state lines could increase the risk of accidents due to the experience required to handle commercial vehicles safely.

Before wrapping up, Pugh addressed the recent announcement from former President Trump of a 25 percent tariff on imported medium- and heavy-duty trucks, explaining that the measure is expected to impact pickup and vocational truck imports more significantly than long-haul commercial carriers.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

The topic of this Firm to Farm blog post by RFD-TV agri-legal expert Roger McEowen is a potpourri of legal issues facing farmers and ranchers—farm bankruptcy, sovereign immunity, farm leases, and pipeline damages.
FarmHER to premiere on Tuesday, March 19th at 9 p.m. ET with 6 New Episodes; and RanchHER to premiere on Tuesday, April 30th at 9 p.m. ET with 6 New Episodes
Mon, 3/4/24 – 8 PM ET | 7 PM CT | 6 PM MT | 5 PM PT
What can these facilities do to protect themselves? I wrote about this issue last spring, and since that time, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has issued a significant opinion. That makes an update in order.