Zippy Duvall on AM Radio: It’s not just a convenience, it’s a critical lifeline of information

As groups continue their fight for AM radio, reminding lawmakers about its importance in rural America.

There has been a lot of back and forth over the last couple of years. Automakers have looked to shed AM radio as a cost-saving measure, but for rural communities, that change could mean losing a key source of information.

American Farm Bureau President Zippy Duvall says AM radio is still essential in areas where other communication options are limited.

“As a troubling trend among auto makers who are considering removing AM radio from their new cars, AM radio is not just a convenience, it’s a critical lifeline of information for rural America. Remote areas lack reliable broadband coverage, so farmers and their families rely on radio for current markets, breaking news, and perhaps most importantly, severe weather alerts to work in the open and miles from home. Response time is critical.”

Duvall says he supports the Am Radio in Every Vehicle Act, which would require carmakers to continue including AM radios in new cars and trucks.

Related Stories
What is AM Radio? How does it work? And how is it different from FM radio? Let’s dig into the details!

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

API said it stands ready to work with Congress to develop a balanced approach to E15 legislation that promotes fuel choice, supports investment certainty, and contributes to a stable and fair marketplace for American consumers.
Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how Washington’s “managed trade” approach — keeping leverage through long-term tariffs — will affect farmers, global markets, and future export opportunities.
In the meantime, Senate Majority Leader John Thune is asking that farmers be allowed to use marketing assistance loans to help stay afloat.
Beef industry groups seem to agree — market-based pricing, not federal intervention, best supports rancher livelihoods and long-term beef supply stability.
Cattle groups say additional imports would offer little relief for consumers but could erode rancher confidence as the industry begins to rebuild herds.