LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD-TV) — A long-running debate over indirect land-use change — often called ILUC — is resurfacing as biofuel policy again weighs carbon penalties tied to theoretical global land-use impacts. John Duff of Serō Ag Strategies says ILUC began as a reasonable idea meant to prevent deforestation overseas.
Still, the system that grew around it quickly crossed into modeling assumptions that cannot be seen or measured. The result is a policy structure in which U.S. farmers and biofuel producers are penalized for land clearing that may not actually be happening, while fuels from regions with real deforestation concerns sometimes receive more favorable treatment.
Duff explains that large economic forecasting models mainly drive today’s ILUC penalties. These models aim to predict how farmers worldwide might respond if more U.S. grain is used for ethanol. Because they rely on assumptions about human behavior and international markets, the models often disagree and can drift far from real-world conditions. Still, their projections were built into federal and state carbon rules more than a decade ago, giving hypothetical outcomes the weight of law.
This mismatch has created uneven carbon scores, competitive disadvantages for U.S. ethanol, and a system that can punish farm efficiency rather than rewarding it. Duff says a better approach already exists: a risk-based framework used in Canada and parts of Europe. Instead of assigning blanket penalties, regulators verify whether feedstocks come from established cropland and whether local practices pose any real risk of land conversion.
Duff argues that such an approach keeps the focus on preventing deforestation while grounding policy in observable, verifiable facts —not in global economic guesses.
Farm-Level Takeaway: Duff says farmers and ethanol producers would benefit from a risk-based ILUC system that protects forests without relying on speculative modeling.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
November 04, 2025 02:44 PM
Recent U.S.–China trade developments provided a small lift for soy markets, though most traders are waiting for concrete purchase data before making major moves.
November 04, 2025 12:34 PM
·
According to Ag Secretary Brooke Rollins, the top three soy-crushing companies in Bangladesh agreed to buy $1 billion worth of U.S. soybeans over the next year.
November 04, 2025 11:17 AM
·
USDA will meet part of November SNAP benefits under court direction, citing insufficient funds for full payments.
November 04, 2025 10:20 AM
·
An import lag for ground beef will likely look different than last year’s egg shortage. The difference comes down to biosecurity and market flexibility.
November 03, 2025 12:07 PM
·
The WASDE/Crop Production combo will be the first full read on supply, demand, and yield that could move basis and hedging plans since the government shutdown more than a month ago.
November 03, 2025 09:34 AM
·
U.S. Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-SD) shares his outlook on the developing U.S.-China Trade agreement, and the ongoing impact of the federal government shutdown—now stretching past four weeks—on rural communities and producers.
October 31, 2025 01:35 PM
·
Market analyst and friend of the show, Shawn Hackett, says Brazil’s shifting use of crops for biofuel production is a significant factor.
October 31, 2025 01:17 PM
·
The Livestock Conservancy joins us in the RFD-TV Studio to discuss how protecting heritage-breed poultry is essential to resilient food systems and the preservation of agricultural traditions.
October 31, 2025 12:59 PM
·
