Bipartisan Effort Aims to Block Federal Hemp Ban, Give States Regulatory Power

Led by Sen. Rand Paul, lawmakers aim to prevent a November federal hemp ban, advocating for state control as farmers face planting uncertainties.

Angela_Dawson_21_07_31_USA_MN_Hemp_Cooperative_0G4A0672.jpg

The Minnesota Hemp Cooperative

FarmHER, Inc.

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — Right now in Washington, there is an ongoing bipartisan push to stop a planned national ban on certain hemp products, set to take effect in November. Lawmakers warn the move could have a major impact on farmers and the multibillion-dollar hemp industry.

The proposal would allow states to opt out of the federal ban if they enforce strict safety rules, including limits on synthetic hemp compounds. Supporters say the goal is to protect consumers while preserving a rapidly growing market, but uncertainty is already affecting decisions on the farm.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is making the case for producers, arguing that states should have the authority to regulate hemp rather than a one-size-fits-all federal approach.

“No one in Washington discussed the issue. There was no investigation, no hearings,” Paul said. “When Kentucky passed it, they studied it for six months. They decided they wanted to keep it out of the hands of children, regulate the age, and punish stores that sell to underage minors. They handled it in a thoughtful manner, and we ought to let that become the law rather than have people in Washington who never studied the issue make the final decision.”

Paul says the timing of the proposed ban is creating real challenges for farmers, who must decide months in advance whether to plant hemp.

“It’s difficult for those in the hemp business right now because it’s a crop — it has to be planted,” he said. “If it’s going to be made illegal in November, farmers are wondering whether they should plant it this year. They’ve probably already had to make that decision.”

He added that he is working across the aisle with a Democratic senator to ensure states that already regulate hemp can continue to do so, even if federal restrictions move forward.

The proposal is expected to be part of broader discussions around the next farm bill, as lawmakers weigh shifting more authority over hemp regulation to the states while the federal debate continues.

For now, producers are left navigating uncertainty — balancing market opportunity against the risk of sudden regulatory changes.

Related Stories
Modern Ag Alliance’s Elizabeth Burns-Thompson joins Eliza to discuss the need for uniform pesticide labeling, glyphosate litigation, and the push for clearer, science-based environmental policy.
Negotiators are focusing on tariffs, market access, and economic security as broader trade discussions continue.
Natasha McCrary of 1818 Farms joins us to share the inspiration behind their new “America 250" Collection, and how rural traditions continue to shape modern American history and culture.
The American Sheep Industry Association says high labor costs and volatile markets continue creating pressure for producers.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

U.S. Wheat Associates is expanding into global fish feed markets, with early gains in South America and new opportunities emerging in Ecuador’s shrimp industry.
Dr. Jeffrey Gold discusses the recent hantavirus outbreak linked to a South American cruise ship and Nebraska’s monitoring efforts on this week’s Rural Health Matters.
Cattle analysts say the U.S. beef cattle herd rebuild still faces major hurdles despite some minor positive signals noted in certain regions.
Andy Tauer from the National Pork Board discusses efforts to boost pork demand and how the industry is responding to trade restrictions related to pseudorabies.
Dr. Robert Ellis joins us to discuss economic challenges in agriculture, available resources for farmers, and ways producers can evaluate practices to strengthen their operations.
While there is no guarantee a House vote will happen today, the measure has officially been placed on the congressional calendar.