Bipartisan Effort Aims to Block Federal Hemp Ban, Give States Regulatory Power

Led by Sen. Rand Paul, lawmakers aim to prevent a November federal hemp ban, advocating for state control as farmers face planting uncertainties.

Angela_Dawson_21_07_31_USA_MN_Hemp_Cooperative_0G4A0672.jpg

The Minnesota Hemp Cooperative

FarmHER, Inc.

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — Right now in Washington, there is an ongoing bipartisan push to stop a planned national ban on certain hemp products, set to take effect in November. Lawmakers warn the move could have a major impact on farmers and the multibillion-dollar hemp industry.

The proposal would allow states to opt out of the federal ban if they enforce strict safety rules, including limits on synthetic hemp compounds. Supporters say the goal is to protect consumers while preserving a rapidly growing market, but uncertainty is already affecting decisions on the farm.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is making the case for producers, arguing that states should have the authority to regulate hemp rather than a one-size-fits-all federal approach.

“No one in Washington discussed the issue. There was no investigation, no hearings,” Paul said. “When Kentucky passed it, they studied it for six months. They decided they wanted to keep it out of the hands of children, regulate the age, and punish stores that sell to underage minors. They handled it in a thoughtful manner, and we ought to let that become the law rather than have people in Washington who never studied the issue make the final decision.”

Paul says the timing of the proposed ban is creating real challenges for farmers, who must decide months in advance whether to plant hemp.

“It’s difficult for those in the hemp business right now because it’s a crop — it has to be planted,” he said. “If it’s going to be made illegal in November, farmers are wondering whether they should plant it this year. They’ve probably already had to make that decision.”

He added that he is working across the aisle with a Democratic senator to ensure states that already regulate hemp can continue to do so, even if federal restrictions move forward.

The proposal is expected to be part of broader discussions around the next farm bill, as lawmakers weigh shifting more authority over hemp regulation to the states while the federal debate continues.

For now, producers are left navigating uncertainty — balancing market opportunity against the risk of sudden regulatory changes.

Related Stories
Mike Stranz joins us to discuss farm safety net reforms, NFU’s proposed IMSET program, and the challenges facing family farmers nationwide.
The investigation does not prove wrongdoing, but it raises federal scrutiny of a major cost center for crop producers.
The state-level focus is split between labeling and sales restrictions.
For decades, U.S. agriculture has planned around feeding a growing world. Experts say that trend could reverse course in the next 30 years.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Turner built one of the nation’s largest private land holdings while becoming a major force in bison ranching and conservation.
Dr. Jeffrey Gold joins us on Rural Health Matters to discuss the early warning signs of arthritis, the challenges facing rural populations, and steps individuals can take to manage joint health.
CME Group’s Fred Seamon joins us to break down the drop in farmer sentiment, discuss the role of input costs and global factors, and share his outlook for the ag economy ahead.
RealAg Radio’s Shaun Haney and other experts break down ongoing energy market volatility, its impact on producer decision-making, and key indicators farmers should monitor moving forward.
The New World Screwworm case was detected roughly 119 miles from the U.S.-Mexico border — at nearly the same latitude as Zapata, Texas.
On Tuesday’s Cow Guy Close, host Scott Shellady spoke with USDA Deputy Secretary Stephen Vaden about the decision, what he saw during a recent tour of the property, and why the department believes closure is the best path forward.