Firm to Farm: A New Era of WOTUS — The “Top 10" Ag Law and Tax Developments of 2025

The Supreme Court of the United States looms above a river winding through grasslands.

davidevison, kat7213 – stock.adobe.com

In 2025, the long-running saga of the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) reached a decisive turning point, providing farmers and ranchers with the regulatory clarity that has been sought for decades. Following years of “ping-pong” rulemaking between administrations, the developments of 2025 centered on a final alignment with the Supreme Court’s landmark Sackett v. EPA[1] decision.

In late 2025, the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers unveiled a new rule that finally aligns federal oversight with the Supreme Court’s Sackett decision, effectively replacing bureaucratic ambiguity with standards visible to the naked eye.

For farmers, the 2025 rule represents a victory for property rights. The most significant shift is the adoption of a strict Relatively Permanent” standard. Federal jurisdiction is now limited to bodies of water that are standing or continuously flowing. This change explicitly excludes ephemeral features—those dry ditches and low spots that only carry water after rainfall. Previously, these features left producers vulnerable to heavy fines; today, they are firmly outside federal reach.

To account for regional differences, the rule introduces a “Wet Season” definition. While waters that flow predictably during wetter months may still be regulated, the rule requires a continuous surface connection to navigable waters. If a feature does not maintain water during the defined regional wet season, the federal government has no authority over it.

The 2025 reforms also strengthened essential exclusions. For the first time, groundwater and subsurface tile lines are explicitly excluded by rule, ensuring that vital drainage infrastructure remains a private management matter. Furthermore, Prior Converted Cropland status was simplified: land only loses its exclusion if it is abandoned for more than five years and reverts to a wetland state.

The public comment period on the proposed rule closed in early January of 2026. The agencies are reviewing the submitted comments and are working on the drafting of the final rule, which is expected to be issued sometime in the Spring or Summer of 2026.

WOTUS Comparison: 2023 vs. 2025

FeatureAmended 2023 RuleNov. 2025 Proposed Rule
Primary Standard“Relatively Permanent” but undefinedDefined: Flowing/standing year-round or during a predictable “Wet Season.”
Ephemeral StreamsCase-by-case (often regulated)Explicitly Excluded: Land that only flows after rain is non-jurisdictional.
WetlandsMust have a surface connectionTwo-Prong Test: Must (1) touch a WOTUS and (2) have surface water during the wet season.
GroundwaterGenerally excluded by practiceExplicitly Excluded by Rule: Includes tile drains and subsurface systems.
Interstate WatersRegulated because they cross linesRemoved: Must independently meet the permanence standard to be regulated.

Related Stories
Year-round E15 remains on the table, but procedural caution and competing regional interests pushed action into a slower, negotiated path.
Without additional support, many soybean operations will continue to face financial stress as they prepare for the 2026 crop.
The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association and Public Lands Council published a joint press release regarding the advancement of legislation to delist the Mexican Gray Wolf from the Endangered Species Act.
USDA Rural Development Director for Kentucky, Travis Burton, joined us to discuss the Princeton facility (formerly Porter Road Meats), now backed by the USDA, and its role in expanding domestic meat processing capacity.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer joined us to break down the recent Fifth Circuit Court decision overturning a prior Tax Court decision on self-employment tax for limited partners, the ruling’s impact on farmers, and potential next steps in Congress.
Congressman Adrian Smith of Nebraska joined us with the latest on efforts to secure year-round E15 sales.
Brian Earnest, an animal protein economist with CoBank, shares insights into current demand trends and the challenges facing broiler production.
Jack Hubbard, with the Center for the Environment and Welfare, shares context and perspective on the controversial letter about Prop 12 circulating in Washington and how a review shows it misled the public.
Decoupled base acres may amplify income inequality and distort planting decisions as farm program payments increase.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

For many farm businesses, property taxes on business assets have become a significant and highly visible expense, threatening liquidity, discouraging investment, and creating a disproportionate burden when compared to other industries.
The allure of rural property — with its promise of space, freedom, and self-sufficiency — is undeniable, but local zoning regulations govern the reality.
RFD-TV expert Roger McEowen explains why a “skinny” Farm Bill is likely in the future, but its scope may change due to provisions contained in the Big, Beautiful Bill.
RFD-TV’s farm legal expert, Roger McEowen, digs into the details of both the LRP and the LGM programs, two essential risk management tools for cattle producers.
The FAA’s proposed rule to allow drones to operate beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) could soon revolutionize how farmers and ranchers manage their land.
RFD-TV Farm Legal and Tax Expert Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law dives into a “potpourri” of ag tax and law-related issues in his latest Firm to Farm blog post.