Firm to Farm: Social Security Planning for Farmers

RFD-TV Ag Legal & Tax expert Roger McEowen explains Social Security for farmers and ranchers and how to calculate when to start taking Social Security to maximize your benefits.

When should I take social security? Retirement and finance planning question, handwriting on a napkin with tea.

Photo By MarekPhotoDesign.com via Adobe Stock

Part of retirement planning for a farmer includes Social Security benefits. Relatedly, if you are nearing retirement age, you might be asking yourself when you should start drawing Social Security benefits. The answer is, “it depends.” But there are a few principles to keep in mind.

1. Waiting to take Social Security can pay off.

The first point to remember is that maximum Social Security benefits can be received if you don’t withdraw benefits until you reach full retirement age – presently between ages 66 and 67. Additional benefits can be achieved for each year of postponement until you reach age 70.

2. Your income can affect benefits on a sliding scale.

Another point is that some Social Security benefits are reduced once certain income thresholds are reached. For 2024, if you haven’t reached full retirement age and earn more than $22,320, benefits get reduced by $1 for every $2 above the limit.

During the year you reach full retirement age, the earnings limit is $59,520, with a $1 reduction for every $3 over the limit. Once you hit full retirement age, the limit on earning drops off.

3. What counts as earnings?

In-kind wages count toward the earnings limitation test, but employer-provided health insurance benefits don’t. Also, federal farm program payments are not earnings for years other than the first year you apply for Social Security benefits.

4. Calculate When to Start Drawing Benefits

So, when should you start drawing benefits? It depends on your particular situation and your retirement plan. The Social Security Administration has some useful online calculators that can help. To access these resources, visit https://www.ssa.gov/

Recent Posts by Roger McEowen

Read more of Roger McEowen’s thoughts on agricultural law and policy issues that matter to farmers and ranchers on his RFD Business Blog, Firm to Farm.

USDA’s Harvest Fuel Relief Program could provide short-term assistance to farmers, but ranchers await clarity on payments for fuel, feed, and cattle hauling.
A recent decision from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas addresses an important question: Can a farmer modify a confirmed Chapter 12 plan to extend payments on secured debt beyond five years from the date the first payment under the original plan was due?
Roger McEowen examines how President Trump’s federal diesel tax relief differs from state rules and what Kansas farmers should consider before using dyed diesel on roads.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

A government agency may have authority to regulate groundwater, but that authority does not eliminate the agency’s obligation to respect statutory limits and established property rights.
A recent Wyoming Supreme Court ruling reminds farmers and ranchers that disputes over land access are, ultimately, disputes over property rights.
A Ninth Circuit ruling says federal sovereign immunity does not automatically bar ranchers from enforcing state-adjudicated water rights.
A Lesson in Administrative Law from South Carolina
Cooper-Clark highlights a key lesson for producers and royalty owners: in oil-and-gas royalty disputes, lease language and marketing facts are crucial.
The government should exercise humility before imposing costs on an economy as complex as American agriculture. The 2026 greenhouse-gas regulatory rollback reflects that shift.
A botched art deal demonstrates the dangers of relying on informal understandings when money changes hands.
The concern is not whether clean water, clean air, healthy soil, and responsible stewardship are desirable. Of course they are. The concern is whether calling an environmental condition a “human right” provides a coherent legal rule.
The federal government is closer to a “Waters of the United States” definition that is narrower, more predictable, and more consistent with the Constitution—but farmers should not mistake this for the end of the WOTUS saga.
Agricultural Employers Still Face Potential Backpay Liability
Washington should not try to manufacture a lower beef price. It should create the legal, tax, and economic environment that gives American ranchers a reason to produce more beef.