Firm to Farm: The “One, Big, Beautiful Bill”

Today’s Firm to Farm blog post by RFD-TV legal and tax expert Roger McEowen provides a brief summary of the “One, Big, Beautiful Bill.” If passed in its current form, the legislation would represent the largest tax cuts in history.

agricultural law_adobe stock.png

amazing studio via Adobe Stock

The House Ways and Means Committee has released the text of the tax provisions in what will become “The One, Big, Beautiful Bill.” That actually is the name of the legislation. It’s 389 pages in length.

If passed in its current form, the legislation represents the largest tax cuts in history (counting the continuation of existing law as a tax “cut”). So, my next few days (on top of grading undergraduate and law school exams and getting ready for the 2025 seminar trail that begins in earnest next week) will be consumed with digesting the provisions and projecting their application to farmers and ranchers.

The very brief summary of the “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” – it’s the topic of today’s Firm to Farm blog post by RFD-TV legal and tax expert Roger McEowen.

Core Provisions

The key aspect of the bill is that it permanently extends the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA). That will avoid a large tax hike for all income taxpayers, particularly middle- to lower-income individuals and families. Without an extension, those presently in the 12 percent income tax bracket would face a 25 percent rate increase next year (plus a reduction in the standard deduction and, if they had qualified children, a 50 percent reduction in the child tax credit).

What are some of the other provisions (without getting into the weeds on this post)?

  • No tax on tips
  • No tax on social security benefits
  • No tax on overtime
  • Deduction for buying an American-made automobile
  • An increase in the SALT deduction
  • An increase in the child tax credit
  • Elimination of some of the “green energy” spending contained in the “Inflation Reduction Act” of 2022
  • Permanency of the qualified business income deduction (with a reworked formula that will apply to some taxpayers). This provision impacts approximately 30 million small businesses, including many farming and ranching operations. Without this provision being made permanent, these businesses could have faced a tax rate of over 40 percent. If the bill passes, the rate will be less than 30 percent. For farmers and ranchers, that is particularly important.
  • An increase in Section 179 depreciation
  • A restoration of 100 percent “bonus” depreciation on a retroactive basis
  • Limiting Medicare benefits to U.S. citizens and other qualified individuals
  • Limiting the Section 45Z to taxpayers that derive the fuel exclusively from domestically produced feedstocks
  • An excise tax on investment income of certain universities
  • Barring Obamacare Premium Tax Credits from being used by illegal aliens
  • Requiring a Social Security number for anyone who receives any type of tax credit. This provision, by itself, is estimated to save 30 to 40 billion in government spending.

Not in the Bill

In recent days there had been discussion about the possibility of including a tax increase on individuals making over $2.5 million, but such a provision was not included in the Bill.

Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Scoring

The CBO says that the bill will raise the deficit by $4 trillion. But remember, the CBO is the outfit that said that the TCJA would add $1.5 trillion to the deficit. However, it turned out that the TCJA has resulted in $1.7 trillion of increased revenues above what the CBO projected. The CBO scores tax bills in a static sense. But tax legislation is dynamic – people make economic decisions in reaction to the incentives or disincentives in the bill.

Timeline

The House Ways and Means Committee starts marking the bill to have the Bill on the House floor next week, with House passage before Memorial Day. Then, the bill will be debated in the Senate in June, with any differences between the House and Senate versions worked out, and a final bill will be on the President’s desk for signature on July 4.

Conclusion

In the coming days, I’ll be writing more about the details of the tax legislation. Of course, I’ll cover the tax developments at my upcoming seminars, including the one in Santa Fe, New Mexico, on June 5-6 and Lancaster, PA, on August 4 and 5. The Santa Fe event can also be attended online. The links for those events are here: Farm and Ranch Tax/Estate Planning Seminar (June) | Washburn Law and Farm and Ranch Tax/Estate Planning Seminar (Aug.) | Washburn Law

Related Stories: Firm to Farm
A Kansas Court of Appeals ruling confirms that premarital agreements can waive future homestead rights, impacting farm succession planning, blended-family estates, property rights, fiduciaries, and agricultural attorneys statewide.
Protecting your water is no longer just about ensuring next year’s crop; it is about defending the fundamental constitutional rights that secure the future of American agriculture.
The Agri Stats settlement may prove to be one of the most consequential agricultural antitrust cases in decades.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Producers should coordinate immediately with their CPA and legal counsel to ensure their corporate structures and operational realities are perfectly aligned before the September deadline.
To preserve their property rights, farmers and ranchers must understand the procedural tactics of federal enforcement and take proactive steps to document the visual realities of their land.
Agricultural property presents unique opportunities for scammers to impersonate landowners and attempt to sell rural property they do not own. And in many cases, they are getting dangerously close to succeeding.
Passing a farming operation to the next generation causes incredibly complex challenges, so estate planners often use the QTIP Trust, a powerful estate-planning tool, to bridge the gap.
In agricultural transactions, timing is often far more than a matter of convenience. A delayed closing or missed payment can lead to a major financial problem.
Did the Kansas Court of Appeals Go Too Far in Clark v. McKee?