Checking The Boxes: Senate lawmakers are racing the clock to pass the “Big, Beautiful Bill”

Despite the hiccups, Senate Majority Leader John Thune says he will meet the July 4th deadline for the “Big, Beautiful Bill.”

There are several differences between his version and the House bill, but he tells his colleagues that the Senate version checks a lot of important boxes.

“In addition to providing farmers and ranchers with tax relief, our bill updates the farm safety net to address some of the challenges farmers and ranchers have been facing, and increases reference prices for every covered commodity, and makes these prices more responsive to market conditions in coming years, and increases crop insurance coverage and affordability, including for farmers just starting out. It supports livestock producers by making existing programs more responsive to drought and by funding prevention of animal diseases that can devastate livestock.”

However, lawmakers on the other side of the aisle argue that the bill will be costly to taxpayers. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer says the math is flawed with the cost-saving measures and warns it will hurt the middle class.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition discusses supply chain challenges facing agriculture as snow, sleet and ice threaten most of the Eastern U.S.
Congressman Adrian Smith of Nebraska joined us with the latest on efforts to secure year-round E15 sales.
Nearly everyone in the South Texas ag community appears extremely worried about the potential of a New World screwworm epidemic, according to a local veterinarian. RFD NEWS Correspondent Frank McCaffrey reports.
Large-scale land purchases signal rising competition for ranchland, reinforcing its value while reshaping long-term access and control in rural agriculture.
Brian Earnest, an animal protein economist with CoBank, shares insights into current demand trends and the challenges facing broiler production.
Jack Hubbard, with the Center for the Environment and Welfare, shares context and perspective on the controversial letter about Prop 12 circulating in Washington and how a review shows it misled the public.