NASHVILLE, Tenn. (RFD-TV) — The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2022 decision to register the herbicides Enlist One and Enlist Duo through 2029 is now under direct legal attack, with environmental groups asking a federal court to revoke both labels entirely. The lawsuit argues that EPA failed to meet the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act standard requiring pesticides to avoid “unreasonable adverse effects” on the environment.
If the court sides with plaintiffs, both Enlist products — widely used on 2,4-D-resistant corn, soybeans, and cotton across 34 states — could come off the market.
According to Brigit Rollins, a Staff Attorney with the National Agricultural Law Center, the challenge centers on three allegations: that EPA understated environmental costs, overstated weed-control benefits, and relied on ineffective mitigation measures.
Plaintiffs say EPA used outdated 2018–2019 usage data and ignored the rapid expansion of Enlist technologies. They also argue EPA overstated Enlist’s role in managing resistant weeds, claiming many farmers rely on Enlist alone rather than pairing it with additional chemistries. They further contend that EPA’s new mitigation tools — including a 30-foot drift buffer and a point-based runoff “pick list” — are insufficient, noting research showing 2,4-D can drift farther and runoff controls may not require meaningful management changes.
A ruling to vacate the labels would immediately disrupt broadleaf weed management in major corn, soybean, and cotton states and could ripple through other crop protection products. Because Enlist One and Enlist Duo were among the first herbicides to receive EPA’s new mitigation language, the court’s decision will also shape how future labels apply drift and runoff safeguards.
A decision upholding EPA’s approach, however, would reinforce the agency’s newer mitigation tools and provide regulatory stability for similar products.
Farm-Level Takeaway: A court decision that overturns Enlist labels would remove two major herbicides from use and reshape EPA’s future mitigation policies for other pesticides.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
High ownership does not always translate into high output, underscoring the importance of structural differences in understanding state-level farm performance.
December 28, 2025 03:00 PM
·
Benchmark machinery costs against those of similar-sized, high-performing operations to inform equipment and investment decisions.
December 25, 2025 12:00 PM
·
A narrower Section 1071 rule could reduce regulatory pressure on ag lenders while keeping credit available in rural communities.
December 24, 2025 06:00 AM
·
The U.S. Forest Service takes us on the same journey from a tree farm in Nevada across America to experience the magic of Christmas in the U.S. Capitol.
December 23, 2025 02:15 PM
·
Rep. Randy Feenstra, R-IA, details how the “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” Act (OBBBA) supports farmers, biofuels, and rural communities with tax breaks, crop insurance relief, and ag infrastructure.
December 23, 2025 02:01 PM
·
Oregon FFA CEO Kjer Kizer discusses the proposed budget reductions, potential consequences, and the importance of protecting learning opportunities for students interested in agriculture.
December 23, 2025 01:34 PM
·
RealAg Radio host Shaun Haney explains why the 2026 USMCA review could directly affect dairy access, produce competition, and export reliability for U.S. farmers and ranchers.
December 23, 2025 01:04 PM
·
More than 1,100 residents and farmers have signed a letter urging Ag Secretary Brooke Rollins to step in, saying the proposal threatens irrigation supplies and long-term farm viability in the region.
December 23, 2025 11:37 AM
·
Producers across the country balanced winter weather disruptions, shifting export demand, and tightening margins as year-end decisions come into focus.
December 22, 2025 03:50 PM
·
