Electronic IRS Payments Coming Soon—What Farmers and Taxpayers Need to Know

RFD-TV Farm Legal and Taxation expert Roger McEowen joined us Friday to break down the executive order and what it means for farmers and ranchers.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD-TV) — The IRS is moving away from paper checks as part of a federal push toward fully electronic disbursements. A new executive order directs federal agencies, including the Treasury Department, to stop issuing paper checks—a change that will affect a wide range of government payments to individuals and businesses.

RFD-TV Farm Legal and Taxation expert Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law joined RFD-TV News on Friday to break down the executive order and what it means for taxpayers.

In his interview, McEowen explained that the order includes a September 30 deadline for agencies to comply with the transition. While most taxpayers already use direct deposit, those who still receive paper checks will need to prepare for the shift. He also discussed possible exceptions, noting that some situations—such as certain hardship cases or individuals without access to banking—may still qualify for alternative payment options.

Taxpayers are encouraged to verify their direct-deposit information with the IRS and other federal agencies to avoid delays once paper checks are phased out.

FIRM TO FARM: IRS Moves Toward Electronic Disbursements (and Payments)

Related Stories
Advocacy groups say farmers, ranchers and business owners may need to file claims before a July deadline.
A bipartisan Senate delegation recently traveled to China ahead of President Trump’s meeting in Beijing.
Luke McCrea says his experiences in FFA and 4-H helped shape both his leadership skills and future career goals.
Trucking industry expert Lewie Pugh joins us to discuss rising diesel costs, challenges facing independent truckers, and the broader impact on agriculture and rural transportation.
RealAg Radio host Shaun Haney joins us to discuss the latest developments surrounding the Trump/Xi summit, what the negotiations could mean for U.S. agriculture, and
trade enforcement concerns.