Minnesota Deer Farming Dispute Could Soon Reach a Tipping Point

Concerns over Chronic Wasting Disease are fueling a long-standing legal battle between Minnesota regulators and deer farmers. The case could soon reach the state’s Supreme Court with broader implications for agriculture.

ST. PAUL, Minn. (RFD-TV) — A decade-long debate in Minnesota between the state’s Department of Natural Resources and the private deer farming industry is approaching a potential turning point, with concerns over Chronic Wasting Disease at the center of the dispute. Roger McEowen from the Washburn University School of Law joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report to provide legal context and insight into the ongoing conflict and what could come next.

In his interview with RFD-TV News, McEowen explained that the issue stems from the state’s efforts to control and prevent the spread of Chronic Wasting Disease, a fatal neurological illness affecting deer and other cervids. He discussed how those concerns have prompted increased state regulation and management proposals, including requirements that directly affect deer farmers.

McEowen also addressed the financial implications of those management strategies, particularly the costs associated with fencing and containment systems, noting that such infrastructure can be expensive for producers to install and maintain. He outlined how these costs have contributed to industry challenges.

Additionally, McEowen discussed the decline in the number of white-tailed deer farms operating in Minnesota in recent years, explaining how regulatory pressure and disease concerns have led some operations to exit the industry altogether.

The conversation also turned to the legal path forward, as the Minnesota Supreme Court could hear the case. McEowen explained what it could mean for the industry if the court declines to take it up and how existing rulings would stand in that scenario. Finally, he shared his perspective on whether the case outcome could have broader implications for agriculture beyond deer farming, particularly for how states regulate animal health and disease management across livestock industries.

Firm to Farm: A Property Rights Battle in Minnesota over Deer Farming and CWD

Related Stories
As AI-driven data centers expand in rural South Texas, local officials and economists debate water use, farmland impacts, and the balance between technology growth and agriculture preservation.
As federal policy shifts toward greater tribal sovereignty, farmers and ranchers (and their legal counsel) must prioritize clear, written contracts and stay engaged with state legislative developments and tribal council updates.
Summer fuel rules cap ethanol demand and limit corn upside.
Students say the program builds confidence, teamwork and a sense of purpose.
Roger McEowen breaks down the EPA’s updated dicamba regulations and shares what farmers need to do to remain compliant under the new rules this growing season.
The fourth-generation owner of Georgia’s Arena Acres cultivated a love for floral arts in FFA on a family farm passed down through generations.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Farm programs remain small but politically easier to expand.
Transporting pollinator colonies—primarily honey bee hives—is a major logistical operation in U.S. agriculture. Costs can vary widely depending on distance, fuel prices, labor, and timing.
Jake Charleston from Specialty Risk Insurance Agency recapped an Oklahoma auctioneer contest and recent industry events, showing how stakeholder feedback helps insurers gauge market conditions and risk management needs.
Pat Hord with the National Pork Producers Council joined us to recap producer meetings in Washington and discuss key policy priorities including Prop 12 and agricultural labor.
Cattle-on-Feed is down on the year in the USDA’s April report, with lower placements and marketings signaling tighter feedlot activity.