New Maritime Fees Deepen U.S.-China Trade Tensions

New U.S. fees on Chinese-owned and built ships took effect overnight, marking the latest escalation in maritime trade tensions between Washington and Beijing.

WASHINGTON (RFD-TV) — New fees are now in effect for Chinese-owned and built ships here in the U.S. The mandate took effect overnight. The Trump Administration officials say it is all to balance the scales, but some farmers worry it could mean less money in their pockets if shipping companies begin passing along those new fees.

The fee is $46 per net ton and applies to up to five trips a year, with payments made online through the treasury. China quickly hit back, saying it will charge similar fees on American ships starting at 400 CN¥ (Yuan) per ton and rising over the next few years.

Last night, China said that the fee will not apply to U.S. ships made in China. Officials on both sides say the costs are part of ongoing trade disputes over shipping and maritime rules.

And while the markets are looking to stabilize after a tough stretch in grains and oilseeds, Allendale’s chief strategist, Rich Nelson, says traders are still watching for signs of a rebound in soybeans, as tensions with China continue.

“We do expect some type of brief meeting between Trump and the Chinese president on October 31,” Nelson said. “The question we’re all watching is, will this result in any soybean buying, and if so, how much? So, without real confirmation of that type of story, we cannot suggest yet that soybeans need to rebound. And it still leaves the potential open, maybe for pricing under $10 even here. “

The current government shutdown means no major reports out of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Nelson says that it did not matter much for last week’s WASDE report, but says next month could be a much different story.

“The October supply demand report, which we just missed last week -- most people probably had a relatively good explanation for what USDA would have given us, so I don’t think that would be the big surprise for us,” Nelson said. “Keep in mind, the big concern is really as we go into November, that’s when yield declines are typically seen with a little more severity. So, a lot of us are waiting on our yield story to maybe give it some more support. That’s probably still lined up here in next month’s potential supply-demand report.”

And speaking of reports, some are still delayed, but others, like the Consumer Price Index (CPI) report, will still be released in the coming weeks. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is calling workers back to the office to disseminate that information. Right now, the BLS aims to have those numbers out on October 24.

Related Stories
Despite the need for swift action, many ag lawmakers and industry groups argue that farm aid alone will likely not be sufficient to help farmers without improved trade relations with China.
SDRP Stage 2 now helps producers recover shallow, uninsured losses from major 2023–2024 disasters, with streamlined sign-ups open through April 30.
Tyson’s capacity cuts weaken local basis, tighten kill space, and heighten dependence on imports, signaling more volatility for producers.
Low farmer shares reflect deep consolidation across the food chain, keeping producer returns thin even as retail food prices remain high.
Tyson’s Nebraska plant closure and falling Cattle on Feed numbers send cattle markets tumbling. Analysts warn of tighter supplies, weak margins, and rising global competition.
A regional snapshot of harvest pace, crop conditions, logistics, and livestock economics across U.S. agriculture, prepared by RFD-TV Markets Specialist Tony St. James, for the week of Monday, November 24, 2025.
One trader said the products entering the U.S. are primarily grind and trim, noting that the volume and type of beef, on its own, should not cause a major disruption. However, he says fund traders are reacting heavily to headlines rather than market realities.
Shaun Haney, host of RealAg Radio, provides the latest insight into the timing, expectations, and broader considerations of the potential aid package, despite increasing exports to China.