Rebuilding U.S. Textiles Requires New Industrial Model to Compete with Synthetics

Rebuilding domestic textiles depends on automation and vertical integration, not tariffs or legacy manufacturing models.

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD NEWS) — Efforts to bring textile and apparel manufacturing back to the United States will fail if they rely on outdated models, according to textile executive Bob Antoshak, who argues the industry’s return depends on building something fundamentally different from what existed decades ago. Rising labor costs and global competition have permanently closed the door on labor-intensive mills, but they have not eliminated the opportunity for a modern, automated domestic industry.

Antoshak points to early investments in nearshoring and advanced manufacturing as evidence that the sector can re-emerge if it is highly automated, vertically integrated, and closely connected to consumer demand. These projects prioritize speed, flexibility, and control over low wages, enabling producers to respond more quickly to market shifts and supply disruptions.

He cautions that tariffs alone do not create an industrial strategy. Broad import duties raise costs across the supply chain, including machinery and equipment needed for automation, ultimately increasing expenses for domestic producers and consumers without meaningfully rebuilding capacity.

The viable path forward centers on full vertical integration — from fiber or yarn through finished goods — supported by significant capital investment, advanced robotics, digital planning, and real-time market feedback. This approach reduces dependence on fragmented global sourcing and strengthens supply chain resilience.

Antoshak argues the next U.S. textile sector will be smaller in workforce but higher in output, technologically driven, and built around transparent, distinctly American brand narratives rather than nostalgia.

Related Stories
Jonathan Braley joins us to discuss rising cybersecurity threats in agriculture, the risks of ransomware attacks, and how Food and Ag-ISAC’s new guide can help businesses better protect themselves.
Cotton margins improved slightly, even as fertilizer and fuel costs rose due to the Strait of Hormuz disruption linked to the Iran war.
Flour milling demand stayed generally steady, but total wheat grind remained slightly softer year over year.
The latest developments point to shifting export routes, higher congestion risk, and continuing cost pressure for grain, fertilizer, and energy shipments.
Tyson is still reshaping its beef footprint.
Cotton prices improved last week, but drought, storms, and uneven planting are keeping risk elevated.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Farm Bureau Economist Faith Parum discusses key outcomes from the U.S.-China trade agreement and the benefits of expanding trade across Southeast Asia.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer joined us on Thursday’s Market Day Report to discuss the implications for farmers.
Chris Bliley with Growth Energy discusses ongoing concerns about U.S. ethanol exports and the expansion of market access promised under the Phase One deal between the U.S. and China.
“It does not extinguish right away here — in any sort of sense — the real profitability concerns and people’s ability to pay bills and get to the other side of this in the very short term. This is where the skepticism builds.”
RFD-TV tax expert Roger McEowen discusses the renewed tax provision and how cattle producers can take advantage of it to recover investments in heifer retention and herd expansion more quickly.
U.S. Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) shares his perspective on the U.S.-China trade developments and their potential impact on American producers, farmers, and ranchers.