Rising Long-Term Healthcare Costs Pose Growing Threat to Farm Family Legacies

Roger McEowen discusses how long-term healthcare costs for elderly Americans are reshaping estate-planning decisions for farm families and what producers should consider moving forward.

TOPEKA, KAN. (RFD NEWS) — For many farm families, the land represents far more than a financial asset—it’s a legacy meant to be passed down through generations. But beyond tax challenges and market volatility, rising long-term healthcare costs are emerging as a growing threat to that transition.

Farm legal expert Roger McEowen, with Kansas’ Washburn School of Law, joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report to break down the legal and financial implications for producers.

In his interview with RFD NEWS, McEowen says the cost of long-term care continues to climb, putting significant pressure on farm families who may already be operating on tight margins. Without proper planning, those expenses can quickly erode assets intended to remain within the family.

He emphasized that a “wait and see” approach is often the most expensive mistake producers can make. Delaying estate and healthcare planning can limit available options and increase the likelihood that land or other assets may need to be sold to cover care costs.

A key factor in planning, McEowen noted, is Medicaid’s five-year look-back rule. This provision reviews asset transfers made within five years of applying for benefits, meaning last-minute decisions can trigger penalties and delay eligibility. He also pointed to tools like the Medicaid Asset Protection Trust, which can help shield assets while allowing producers to maintain a level of control over their operation. However, he stressed that these strategies require careful, early implementation to be effective.

The bottom line? Proactive planning is essential. Farmers who work with legal and financial professionals well in advance are in a much stronger position to protect both their operation and their family’s future.

MORE: Preserving the Family Legacy: Long-Term Care Planning for Farmers and Ranchers

Related Stories
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer discusses SDRP payment limits and offers advice for those seeking higher limits.
Mike Schulte with the Oklahoma Wheat Commission joins us to discuss drought stress in the Great Plains and the current outlook for Oklahoma’s winter wheat crop.
Lawmakers advance FY27 agriculture funding bill, highlighting support for rural development, school lunches, disease response, and water issues.
The inverted Choice-Select spread is not a strong warning sign in today’s tighter, higher-quality beef market, according to new analysis from Terrain.
Genevieve Collins from Americans for Prosperity discusses rising Texas property taxes, potential relief, and impacts on farmers, ranchers, and rural communities.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

What can these facilities do to protect themselves? I wrote about this issue last spring, and since that time, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has issued a significant opinion. That makes an update in order.
Updated Dicamba information is the topic of today’s Firm to Farm blog post by RFD-TV’s agri-legal expert Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law.
In addition to their amazing show, RFD-TV’s “Where the Food Comes From” team also publishes a digital cookbook with recipes by people featured on the show.
On January 31, the U.S. House overwhelmingly passed tax legislation containing provisions of importance to farmers and ranchers in particular and many taxpayers in general.
In this Firm to Farm blog post by RFD-TV legal expert Roger McEowen, he looks ahead at what might be the biggest issues in ag law and tax in 2024.
In part seven of his blog series,"Top 10 Developments in Ag Law and Tax in 2023,” agri-legal expert Roger McEowen covers the #1 issues, SCOTUS and defining a “Water of the United States.”