Room To Improve: Expert calls for better crop insurance and conservation relations

“I’ll say first and foremost, we need to make sure that the crop insurance system is not conflicting with these good farming practices.”

As Congress works toward a new Farm Bill, a House Ag Subcommittee talked conservation.

Lawmakers heard from five ag groups, including Tim Fink of the American Farmland Trust, who said that there is room to improve on how crop insurance interacts with conservation.

“I’ll say first and foremost, we need to make sure that the crop insurance system is not conflicting with these good farming practices. There’s been a lot of progress on that front, and there’s still probably progress to be made. I think the other aspect is that when we look at the crop insurance system, if we’re talking about creating additional incentives, it’s something that has to be actuarially sound, and the good news is, when we look at cover crop adoption, we’ve seen a lot of the research, it is reducing overall indemnity payments in the face of a lot of these extreme weather events. It’s also reducing prevent planting payments, and so whatever we can do that looks at the actuarially soundness, builds the research to make that case, and ultimately, our goal is to reward farmers for practices that are saving the public money and saving themselves money.”

Fink says that the Ag Land Easement Subprogram is crucial to preventing land loss. Without policy intervention, AFT estimates 18 million acres of farmland will be lost by 2040.

Related Stories
Ag Committee Chairman Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson has referred to the proposal as “Farm Bill 2.0.”
In the U.S. and Canada, reduced planted acres—not yield losses—led to a decline in potato production, while Mexico saw modest gains due to increased yields and harvested areas.
Alaska Congressman discusses his new role as Executive Vice Chair of the Congressional Western Caucus and his priorities for the West in the 119th Congress.
Farm legal expert Roger McEowen discusses the EPA’s rescission of the 2009 endangerment finding on greenhouse gases and what it could mean for agriculture and rural America.
The USDA says the framework is about “ending abusive government overreach” and “protecting farmers, families, and private property.”