SNAP to It: After passing 45-day stopgap, Congress reignites debate over Farm Bill’s costly Nutrition Title

Now that Washington lawmakers have passed a 45-day stopgap, they have some breathing room to work through some hot-button topics like the high cost of the upcoming Farm Bill, which is due in large part to the funding necessary to support the Nutrition Title.

A 45-day stopgap plan is causing a stir on Capitol Hill, sparking passionate debates on both sides of the aisle. The proposed 2023 Farm Bill is set to be the most expensive one to date, and Senate Agriculture Republicans argue that farmers will bear the brunt of the cost.

According to Chief Economist for Senate Agriculture Republicans John Newton, farm production expenses have skyrocketed — with a $114 billion increase since the current Farm Bill was passed in 2018.

Farmers feel pressure in every category of input costs, including fertilizer, livestock feed, diesel fuel, labor costs, and even pesticide expenses. The USDA also projected farming income is expected to drop in 2023, the largest decline in history. Interest rates are also on the rise, adding to their woes and making matters even more challenging.

On the other side of the aisle, the Nutrition Title stands out as the costliest component of the Farm Bill. However, Senate Agriculture Democrats are determined to retain funding for nutrition programs as their top priority.

Chief Economist for Senate Agriculture Democrats Steven Wallander emphasized the importance of nutrition programs for rural communities. He points out that additional spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits and other nutrition programs can add thousands of rural jobs. In fact, experts say, that every billion dollars spent on SNAP creates more than 500 jobs in the farming sector.

While discussions on the Farm Bill are ongoing, much of lawmaker’s time has been consumed by the challenge of passing a government spending bill. The current 45-day stopgap bill is a temporary measure, but agricultural lawmakers are optimistic about passing a comprehensive Farm Bill before the year concludes.

Related Stories
The Surface Transportation Board rejects the proposed Norfolk Southern–Union Pacific merger, prompting concerns from agricultural shippers about rail consolidation, service reliability, and higher transportation costs.
A look at the legislative year ahead as lawmakers return to Washington with a slate of trade concerns to tackle in 2026—from new Chinese tariffs on beef imports to the USMCA review this summer.
Congressman Adrian Smith of Nebraska joined us with the latest on efforts to secure year-round E15 sales.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Farm CPA Paul Neiffer joined us to break down the recent Fifth Circuit Court decision overturning a prior Tax Court decision on self-employment tax for limited partners, the ruling’s impact on farmers, and potential next steps in Congress.
Americans for Prosperity Arkansas Director Ryan Norris talks energy infrastructure, regulatory reform, and the role of critical minerals in supporting rural America.
Pennsylvania Farm Show scholarship recipient Elizabeth Dice discusses her award, her background in farming, and her path forward in the agriculture industry.
Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition discusses supply chain challenges facing agriculture as snow, sleet and ice threaten most of the Eastern U.S.
Nearly everyone in the South Texas ag community appears extremely worried about the potential of a New World screwworm epidemic, according to a local veterinarian. RFD NEWS Correspondent Frank McCaffrey reports.
Large-scale land purchases signal rising competition for ranchland, reinforcing its value while reshaping long-term access and control in rural agriculture.