There were little market shocks in 2024 but it’s full speed ahead this year

2024 is now in the rearview mirror, but the impact of this season is still being felt. USDA economists say it was an eventful year with little market shocks to help pricing.

“We’ve gone through three or four years of unusual events which have significantly impacted the agricultural sector. We look over the last four years, you got trade friction with China, then you have pandemic issues, then you got a price run-up from the war in Ukraine, and then you’ve got perhaps some production shocks around the world, you have some countries like India putting export controls on rice. I think the difference in this year, then maybe perhaps the last several years, is the absence of a really big shock into the market, which allowed those prices to moderate,” said Seth Meyer.

What is done is done, and it is full speed ahead into 2025. Meyer says if any shocks come to the market, they would come out of South America.

“The big question is if we’re done with that moderation, where does the market sit in terms of its ability to respond to another shock? When you look around the world, I think that’s why we’re taking such a close look at South American production, Russian wheat production, etc. The market seems to be satisfied with where supplies are at the moment, and usually, you see a confluence of forces that put another shock into the market, at least on the supply side. It takes a couple of shocks combined to set off another price spike or for a big geopolitical event.”

Meyer says those geopolitical events can have an impact on either side, for better or for worse.

Related Stories
Olivia Bury, AgriSafe Network Behavioral Health Coordinator, shares about AgriSafe Network’s resources created to support farmers and rural Americans.
Farm legal expert Roger McEowen reviews the history of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule and outlines how shifting definitions across multiple administrations have created regulatory confusion for landowners.
According to November’s Cattle on Feed Report, Nebraska now leads the nation in cattle feeding as tighter supplies continue to reshape regional market power and long-term price dynamics.
These “USDA Foods” are provided to USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) nutrition assistance programs, including food banks that operate The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), and are a vital component of the nation’s food safety net.
Tyson’s closure reflects deep supply shortages in the U.S. cattle industry, tightening packing capacity, weakening competition, and signaling more volatility ahead for cow-calf producers and feedyards.
The agriculture workforce remains strong and diverse, offering meaningful pathways for students pursuing careers that support the food and farm economy.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Mike Steenhoek of the Soy Transportation Coalition discusses industry reactions to the proposed Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern merger, the Surface Transportation Board’s review process, and current conditions on the Mississippi River.
Richard Gupton of the Agricultural Retailers Association explains a new resource designed to help farmers comply with ESA-related pesticide label requirements.
Sen. Roger Marshall discusses the Senate’s unanimous passage of the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act and what expanded milk options could mean for students and dairy farmers. Industry groups say it is a win for student nutrition and dairy producers.
Crop producers face tightening credit and lower incomes, while strong cattle markets continue to stabilize finances in livestock-heavy regions.
Supplemental Disaster Relief Program Stage Two will disburse around $16 billion, approved by Congress last year. Sign-ups begin Monday, and producers have until April to return applications.
An outbreak of Equine Herpesvirus Type 1 (EHV-1) first appeared after livestock events in Texas and Arizona, and some horses have already died.