Expert: New WOTUS Rule Could Bring Clarity for Rural Landowners — If It Sticks

Farm legal expert Roger McEowen reviews the history of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule and outlines how shifting definitions across multiple administrations have created regulatory confusion for landowners.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD-TV) — The newly proposed Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule marks the administration’s latest attempt to finally establish a clear and consistent standard for federal water jurisdiction — an issue that has shaped agricultural policy and created uncertainty for producers for more than a decade. Roger McEowen of the Washburn School of Law joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report to help break down what the rule could mean for farmers and ranchers and to explain how we arrived at this moment.

In his interview with RFD-TV News, McEowen revisited the long, complicated history of WOTUS, outlining how shifting definitions across multiple administrations have created regulatory confusion for landowners. He noted that the new proposal aims to deliver long-awaited clarity by more precisely defining which waters fall under federal oversight. He also walked through several key elements of the proposed rule, explaining how the updated language seeks to balance environmental protection with practical considerations for the ag sector.

As for what comes next, McEowen detailed the upcoming steps in the public review process — including the formal comment period that will allow producers, stakeholders, and the general public to weigh in before the rule moves forward. Looking ahead, McEowen said the big question is whether this proposal will finally deliver the regulatory certainty producers have long sought. While he acknowledged optimism in some areas, he also emphasized the importance of continued engagement from the agricultural community as the process unfolds.

Related Stories: WOTUS
Ag Law expert Roger McEowen explains the latest WOTUS developments and their implications for agricultural water management.
The concern is not whether clean water, clean air, healthy soil, and responsible stewardship are desirable. Of course they are. The concern is whether calling an environmental condition a “human right” provides a coherent legal rule.
The federal government is closer to a “Waters of the United States” definition that is narrower, more predictable, and more consistent with the Constitution—but farmers should not mistake this for the end of the WOTUS saga.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Think applying an insecticide to your soybean field automatically pays for itself? You would be mistaken. University of Illinois Extension field crops entomologist Nick Seiter says it does not.
Cattle placements fell 9% in August, while New Mexico joined USDA’s meat inspection program, potentially expanding processing options for livestock producers.
The Brooksher family says it is the best corn crop they have ever seen. But even a bumper harvest comes with challenges, as higher fuel and input costs squeeze profit margins.
Farm Bureau says development, high land values, and farm economics are putting pressure on U.S. farmland as farm numbers and acres decline.
Drought and extreme heat are hurting Oklahoma cotton, with 55% of the crop rated in the worst condition category.
China has purchased about 12.5 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans as Trump and Xi prepare to meet, bringing it close to half of its annual commitment.