There’s a flip side to the success of artificial intelligence, and economists encourage caution

Artificial intelligence is finding its way to more farms and ranches.

One ag analyst says it has the potential to do great things, but warns there is a flip side to that success.

“I talk about spot sprayers using lasers instead of chemicals. Talk about cell phone apps where you can go to the cattle sale and point your phone right at the cattle, and it’ll tell you the weight of the cattle. So, there are all kinds of new AI technology available. That’s not what I’m concerned about. I think that’s awesome. What I’m concerned about is as we go in and say, tell me about ‘x,’ and we use AI, and it gives us an answer. What I have found is AI is more inaccurate. It is more biased, rather than being accurate and unbiased,” said Doug Johnson.

Johnson says it is also important to be careful of your expectations, especially as AI integrates with agriculture.

“What I’m talking about here is we have to be careful on what we expect out of it. Right now, if you go and do AI for just searching information, it’ll give you answers, but what I’m finding is the answers are not as accurate right now. It’s in the early learning stage, and my concern in our society is, are we diligently fact-checking the answers that we receive from this AI tool? Now, in agriculture, if you look at AI and the technology, there’s a whole new world out here that could enhance development.”

A majority of ag leaders are on board with artificial intelligence. Farm Bureau president Zippy Duvall said last year that as integration grows, so does the need for thoughtful policy on governing it.

Related Stories
Young farmer Elizabeth Bergschneider explains how Monil Virtual Fences supports her family’s succession planning and helps the next generation manage the farm remotely.
USDA Selects Eight Projects Representing More Than $1.3 Billion in American Fertilizer Manufacturing Investment to Strengthen National Security and Support Farmers
Jess Peterson says January could bring a strong start if global pressures ease.
Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas discusses the Harvest Fuel Relief program, producers’ financial pressures, and next steps for farm legislation.
GasBuddy says Chinese production and Russian oil remain key factors for diesel supplies.
The special provision giving producers the higher of ARC or PLC for 2025 will not continue next year.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Higher shipping costs could make U.S. grain less competitive overseas.
Slower exports and stronger foreign competition are weighing on the U.S. pork sector.
More soybeans are being processed domestically as renewable fuels drive demand for soybean oil.
USDA’s new regional cattle report could give producers a clearer view of cash prices as negotiated trade continues to shrink.
Countries that buy American cotton could receive favorable tariff treatment on qualifying apparel.
New and expanded rail lines could give Brazilian soybean and corn exports a stronger cost advantage.
Barge traffic improved, but grain movement continues to face higher transportation costs during harvest.
Temporary policy changes could help ease fuel costs while refineries get back on track. RFD-TV Markets Specialist Tony St. James dug into U.S. policy and found four wildcard ideas that might work.
Open cotton remains vulnerable to rain and severe weather as High Plains growers weigh harvest costs and abandonment.
Lower tariffs could improve U.S. competitiveness, but the framework does not guarantee Chinese purchases.
Expanding crush capacity and export markets are helping absorb larger supplies.
President Donald J. Trump and Agriculture Secretary Brooke L. Rollins announced $8 billion in one-time USDA payments to farmers this harvest season, providing relief from temporary market disruptions and rising input costs.