USDA Cuts $300M Biden-Era Program for First-Time Farmers, Citing ‘Abuse of Federal Funds’

The Biden Administration launched the Increasing Land, Capital, and Market Access (ILCMA) program in 2023 to help underserved farmers facing barriers to land ownership.

usda building_Photo by Chad via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo by Chad via Adobe Stock

Washington, D.C. (RFD News) — According to reports from Politico and Civil Eats, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has canceled a $300 million program designed to help farmers purchase and retain land, a move that is drawing mixed reactions across the agricultural sector.

The program—known as the Increasing Land, Capital, and Market Access (ILCMA) initiative—was created under the Biden Administration’s American Rescue Plan and launched in 2023 to support beginning and underserved farmers facing barriers to land ownership.

According to multiple reports, the program had awarded funding to roughly 50 projects nationwide through nonprofits, tribal groups, and universities, with the goal of improving access to land, capital, and markets. However, the USDA has now terminated most of those contracts, effectively ending the initiative before it could be fully implemented.

The cancellation affects organizations that reportedly had already begun implementing projects to help farmers—particularly those historically underserved—gain access to land and financing. Many of those projects targeted barriers such as high land costs, lack of capital, and succession planning challenges.

Advocates say the loss of funding could have significant consequences, especially as farmland prices remain elevated and entry into agriculture becomes increasingly difficult for younger producers. Some groups report that farmers were already in the pipeline for assistance, including down payment support for land purchases, when the funding was cut.

Meanwhile, the decision is adding to ongoing conversations about land access, generational turnover in agriculture, and how best to support the next wave of American farmers.

USDA Defends Decision to Cut the Program

In termination letters, USDA officials said the program no longer aligns with agency priorities, citing concerns over diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) criteria and how funds were being used. According to reporting, officials described the initiative as involving “discriminatory preferences” and characterized some spending as wasteful.

The agency also cited examples of expenditures it deemed inappropriate, arguing that the program did not sufficiently focus on direct support for farmers.

Organizations impacted by the decision have been given the opportunity to appeal the cancellations, and some are considering legal action. The move is part of a broader review of USDA programs as the agency reassesses spending priorities and policies under the current administration.

RFD NEWS reached out to the USDA to confirm these reports, and a department spokesperson provided the following statement:

“Over the last year, USDA has worked to clean up the mess left for us by the last Administration. To no surprise, a peek behind the curtain of this Biden-era program revealed the egregious misuse of taxpayer dollars to the tune of nearly $300 million dollars.

Under the guise of increasing land access for producers, the ILA program included no minimum requirement for direct producer support.

Instead, the program permitted the abuse of federal funds, including expenditures on the purchasing of a barbecue smoker, construction of a gazebo, massages, and for one awardee, a $20,000 budget for ink pens alone.

Specific Examples of inappropriate spending under the ILA program include:
  • $20,000 for a barbecue smoker
  • $20,000 allocated for massages for farmers
  • $110,000 for a camper/RV
  • $27,000 for drones
  • $112,500 for refreshments
  • $130,355 for office supplies, including $20,000 for pens
  • $10,000 for a camera to livestream cooking videos
  • Funding for gazebo construction
  • Multi-million-dollar budgets with vague justifications such as “travel” and “supplies”

USDA remains committed to restoring fiscal discipline and ensuring that programs serve the farmers and ranchers we are mandated to support. Under this Administration, USDA programs will uphold market principles, engage in fiscal discipline, and provide adequate funding to the farmers it exists to support.
USDA Spokesperson

Related Stories
The new county maps show farm program payments are widespread, but payment design still produces very different outcomes across regions and crops. AgriSompo’s Brooks York joins us to discuss the role of crop insurance in supporting mental health.
Student Katelyn Lindsay is traveling the country to support growers and connect consumers to the crop.
Nebraska cattle rancher Joe Van Newkirk joins us to discuss wildfire recovery in Nebraska’s Sandhills athe challenges ranchers face restoring basic infrastructure after the fire.
Seasonal pricing strength is lining up with crop stress, giving wheat producers another weather-driven marketing window. Shaun Haney joins us to discuss concerns from ag bankers on farm profitability.
Dr. Ernie Goss joined us to break down the latest Rural Main Street Index, discuss pressures on farm finances and equipment sales, and share expectations for the ag economy ahead.
In an exclusive interview with RFD News correspondent Frank McCaffrey, Congressman Henry Cuellar (D-TX) expresses frustration with delays and increasing political divisions surrounding the bill.
Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Chad Fiechter joins us to discuss Purdue’s precision ag study, challenges in capturing value from technology, and what farmers should consider when investing in and adopting these tools.
Ethanol demand held together last week, but lower production and thinner stocks put more focus on export strength. Production capacity is also strengthening over time and benefiting soybean farmers.
Farm Bureau Economist Dr. Faith Parum discusses USDA’s efforts to expand fertilizer capacity, signals for farm profitability, and AFBF’s Farm Bill expectations.
Kansas Congressman Derek Schmidt joins us to discuss House passage of the Farm Bill, its potential impact on farm profitability and stability, key policy compromises, and the outlook for Senate consideration.
The farm bill is still moving, but the toughest amendment fights were pushed into today’s session. ASA President Scott Metzger joins us to discuss the risks of tariff actions on soybean exports, concerns over trade policy and production costs, and the importance of Farm Bill updates.
John Mays with Central Life Sciences joins us to discuss the importance of pest management ahead of wheat storage and how protecting grain quality can support stronger marketing opportunities.