AFBF: Whole Milk in Schools Would Give U.S. Dairy a Needed Boost in Butterfat Demand

AFBF Economist Danny Munch shares how passing the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act could give the dairy industry a needed boost.

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD-TV) — U.S. milk production is on pace to reach a record high this year, even as overall fluid milk consumption continues to decline. One potential bright spot for the industry could come from a renewed effort to allow whole milk back into schools.

Legislation aimed at reversing restrictions on whole milk is still awaiting full consideration by both the House and Senate. Supporters say the change could provide a meaningful boost for dairy demand while giving students more nutritious options.

American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) Economist Danny Munch joined us on Thursday’s Market Day Report to discuss the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act’s potential impact on the dairy industry.

In his interview with RFD-TV News, Munch explained why whole milk was initially restricted in schools and provided insight into current consumption trends. He said recent years have seen a steady drop in fluid milk consumption, driven by evolving consumer preferences and competition from alternative beverages.

Previously, Munch explained, whole milk was removed from schools due to dietary trends that favored a reduction in children’s intake of saturated fat, but that science has since been disproved. However, he also noted that the proposed legislation would not require schools to serve whole milk — merely give them the option to do so.

Munch also noted that returning whole milk to school cafeterias could have positive effects on both student nutrition and dairy producers, helping to stabilize demand and support farm income.

Currently, Munch said, the 2% and nonfat milk served in schools account for approximately 8% of total fluid milk demand. Adding whole milk to the mix would also increase butterfat demand for whole milk. Great news for the U.S. dairy industry, which has recently experienced domestic production booms that have reduced stocks.

Related Stories
A SCOTUS ruling on Trump’s tariffs could have long-term implications on the authority of future administrations to control U.S. trade policy, according to RFD-TV legal expert Roger McEowen.
The Sheinbaum–Rollins meeting signals progress, but the focus remains on fully containing screwworm before cross-border movement resumes.
Recent U.S.–China trade developments provided a small lift for soy markets, though most traders are waiting for concrete purchase data before making major moves.
Expect modest relief on several produce lines, mixed protein trends into holiday buying, and softer veg-oil costs — a good week to sharpen forward buys selectively.
According to Ag Secretary Brooke Rollins, the top three soy-crushing companies in Bangladesh agreed to buy $1 billion worth of U.S. soybeans over the next year.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

API said it stands ready to work with Congress to develop a balanced approach to E15 legislation that promotes fuel choice, supports investment certainty, and contributes to a stable and fair marketplace for American consumers.
Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how Washington’s “managed trade” approach — keeping leverage through long-term tariffs — will affect farmers, global markets, and future export opportunities.
In the meantime, Senate Majority Leader John Thune is asking that farmers be allowed to use marketing assistance loans to help stay afloat.
Beef industry groups seem to agree — market-based pricing, not federal intervention, best supports rancher livelihoods and long-term beef supply stability.
Cattle groups say additional imports would offer little relief for consumers but could erode rancher confidence as the industry begins to rebuild herds.