LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD-TV) — A long-running debate over indirect land-use change — often called ILUC — is resurfacing as biofuel policy again weighs carbon penalties tied to theoretical global land-use impacts. John Duff of Serō Ag Strategies says ILUC began as a reasonable idea meant to prevent deforestation overseas.
Still, the system that grew around it quickly crossed into modeling assumptions that cannot be seen or measured. The result is a policy structure in which U.S. farmers and biofuel producers are penalized for land clearing that may not actually be happening, while fuels from regions with real deforestation concerns sometimes receive more favorable treatment.
Duff explains that large economic forecasting models mainly drive today’s ILUC penalties. These models aim to predict how farmers worldwide might respond if more U.S. grain is used for ethanol. Because they rely on assumptions about human behavior and international markets, the models often disagree and can drift far from real-world conditions. Still, their projections were built into federal and state carbon rules more than a decade ago, giving hypothetical outcomes the weight of law.
This mismatch has created uneven carbon scores, competitive disadvantages for U.S. ethanol, and a system that can punish farm efficiency rather than rewarding it. Duff says a better approach already exists: a risk-based framework used in Canada and parts of Europe. Instead of assigning blanket penalties, regulators verify whether feedstocks come from established cropland and whether local practices pose any real risk of land conversion.
Duff argues that such an approach keeps the focus on preventing deforestation while grounding policy in observable, verifiable facts —not in global economic guesses.
Farm-Level Takeaway: Duff says farmers and ethanol producers would benefit from a risk-based ILUC system that protects forests without relying on speculative modeling.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
Input costs are top of mind for farmers, as they contribute to higher prices and smaller profits.
October 28, 2025 12:00 PM
·
The review signals renewed scrutiny of China’s agricultural trade pledges and could reshape farm export opportunities depending on its outcome.
October 28, 2025 11:20 AM
·
The U.S.-Japan tech pact signals long-term investment in bio-innovation, connectivity, and secure supply chains — all of which can strengthen rural manufacturing, ag exports, and digital infrastructure critical to the next generation of farm productivity.
October 28, 2025 11:01 AM
·
Industry leaders representing more than 40 nations gathered to discuss the future of ethanol and other corn-based products.
October 27, 2025 12:44 PM
·
Stay alert for trade announcements—especially border reopening timelines, tariff threats, and developments in Brazil’s export flows.
October 24, 2025 01:56 PM
·
Set targets and use forwards, futures, or options to manage downside while preserving room for rallies.
October 24, 2025 11:05 AM
·
Sen. Roger Marshall explains which types of beef are imported into the United States, how there’s room for new imports, and logical reasons for current high prices.
October 23, 2025 12:10 PM
·
U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-NE) discusses the USDA’s new cattle plan, ethanol policy, and the broader challenges ahead for rural America.
October 23, 2025 11:24 AM
·
Bioethanol continues to gain ground as the bridge fuel connecting agriculture, aviation, and maritime industries in the global shift toward lower-carbon energy.
October 23, 2025 10:14 AM
·
