LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD-TV) — A long-running debate over indirect land-use change — often called ILUC — is resurfacing as biofuel policy again weighs carbon penalties tied to theoretical global land-use impacts. John Duff of Serō Ag Strategies says ILUC began as a reasonable idea meant to prevent deforestation overseas.
Still, the system that grew around it quickly crossed into modeling assumptions that cannot be seen or measured. The result is a policy structure in which U.S. farmers and biofuel producers are penalized for land clearing that may not actually be happening, while fuels from regions with real deforestation concerns sometimes receive more favorable treatment.
Duff explains that large economic forecasting models mainly drive today’s ILUC penalties. These models aim to predict how farmers worldwide might respond if more U.S. grain is used for ethanol. Because they rely on assumptions about human behavior and international markets, the models often disagree and can drift far from real-world conditions. Still, their projections were built into federal and state carbon rules more than a decade ago, giving hypothetical outcomes the weight of law.
This mismatch has created uneven carbon scores, competitive disadvantages for U.S. ethanol, and a system that can punish farm efficiency rather than rewarding it. Duff says a better approach already exists: a risk-based framework used in Canada and parts of Europe. Instead of assigning blanket penalties, regulators verify whether feedstocks come from established cropland and whether local practices pose any real risk of land conversion.
Duff argues that such an approach keeps the focus on preventing deforestation while grounding policy in observable, verifiable facts —not in global economic guesses.
Farm-Level Takeaway: Duff says farmers and ethanol producers would benefit from a risk-based ILUC system that protects forests without relying on speculative modeling.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
RFD-TV Farm Legal and Tax Expert Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law dives into a “potpourri” of ag tax and law-related issues in his latest
Firm to Farm blog post.
October 07, 2025 02:56 PM
·
Lewis Williamson, from HTS Commodities, joined us to share insights on the farm economy from producers in the field.
October 07, 2025 12:47 PM
·
Key signs of the U.S. beef herd’s recovery are improved pasture conditions, lower feed costs, and increased regulatory alignment and support for producers to implement targeted grazing practices.
October 07, 2025 12:35 PM
·
Dr. Mark Svoboda with the National Drought Mitigation Center discusses a new global drought report and resources to help operations increase drought resilience.
October 07, 2025 11:58 AM
·
Congress has just over a month of working days left for the year. Plan for uneven USDA service until funding is restored, and closely monitor Farm Bill talks, as avoiding Permanent Law before January 1 is the single biggest risk to markets and milk prices.
October 07, 2025 11:09 AM
·
Focus on home radon testing—not changing your diet—because background sources vastly outweigh any exposure from naturally radioactive foods.
October 06, 2025 01:29 PM
·
“A government shutdown impacts all Americans and has serious consequences, including for farmers. It just adds additional uncertainty, disrupts critical services.”
October 06, 2025 11:23 AM
·
On Champions of Rural America, Rep. Dusty Johnson underscores the Western Caucus’ ongoing commitment to advocating for farmers and rural communities.
October 03, 2025 03:21 PM
·
Consumer demand for regional food systems is strong, but the challenge lies in scaling production and infrastructure to meet that growing need.
October 03, 2025 02:57 PM
·
