Bipartisan Effort Aims to Block Federal Hemp Ban, Give States Regulatory Power

Led by Sen. Rand Paul, lawmakers aim to prevent a November federal hemp ban, advocating for state control as farmers face planting uncertainties.

Angela_Dawson_21_07_31_USA_MN_Hemp_Cooperative_0G4A0672.jpg

The Minnesota Hemp Cooperative

FarmHER, Inc.

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — Right now in Washington, there is an ongoing bipartisan push to stop a planned national ban on certain hemp products, set to take effect in November. Lawmakers warn the move could have a major impact on farmers and the multibillion-dollar hemp industry.

The proposal would allow states to opt out of the federal ban if they enforce strict safety rules, including limits on synthetic hemp compounds. Supporters say the goal is to protect consumers while preserving a rapidly growing market, but uncertainty is already affecting decisions on the farm.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is making the case for producers, arguing that states should have the authority to regulate hemp rather than a one-size-fits-all federal approach.

“No one in Washington discussed the issue. There was no investigation, no hearings,” Paul said. “When Kentucky passed it, they studied it for six months. They decided they wanted to keep it out of the hands of children, regulate the age, and punish stores that sell to underage minors. They handled it in a thoughtful manner, and we ought to let that become the law rather than have people in Washington who never studied the issue make the final decision.”

Paul says the timing of the proposed ban is creating real challenges for farmers, who must decide months in advance whether to plant hemp.

“It’s difficult for those in the hemp business right now because it’s a crop — it has to be planted,” he said. “If it’s going to be made illegal in November, farmers are wondering whether they should plant it this year. They’ve probably already had to make that decision.”

He added that he is working across the aisle with a Democratic senator to ensure states that already regulate hemp can continue to do so, even if federal restrictions move forward.

The proposal is expected to be part of broader discussions around the next farm bill, as lawmakers weigh shifting more authority over hemp regulation to the states while the federal debate continues.

For now, producers are left navigating uncertainty — balancing market opportunity against the risk of sudden regulatory changes.

Related Stories
“It really hamstrings our availability of financing to get loans when everything is costing 30-60% more.”
“It doesn’t matter what we do in Canada or the United States, it’s not going to help the monarch population.”

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Speaking about his administration’s tariff strategy, Trump acknowledged that producers could face financial strain in the short term but promised stopgap support.
Rising cow numbers and higher yields are boosting milk supplies, which may keep pressure on prices and farm margins into the fall.
As input costs continue to rise, diesel prices have held steady in recent weeks, according to energy analysts at GasBuddy.
U.S. soybean farmers are growing increasingly frustrated by Argentina’s gains in Chinese grain contracts and Trump’s pledge of economic support for the South American ally.
The USDA is moving to close the farm trade gap through promotion, missions, and stronger export financing.
Farm legal and taxation expert Roger McEowen explains the IRS’s shift to electronic payments and disbursements, and what it means for upcoming tax filings.