Firm to Farm: A New Era of WOTUS — The “Top 10" Ag Law and Tax Developments of 2025

The Supreme Court of the United States looms above a river winding through grasslands.

davidevison, kat7213 – stock.adobe.com

In 2025, the long-running saga of the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) reached a decisive turning point, providing farmers and ranchers with the regulatory clarity that has been sought for decades. Following years of “ping-pong” rulemaking between administrations, the developments of 2025 centered on a final alignment with the Supreme Court’s landmark Sackett v. EPA[1] decision.

In late 2025, the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers unveiled a new rule that finally aligns federal oversight with the Supreme Court’s Sackett decision, effectively replacing bureaucratic ambiguity with standards visible to the naked eye.

For farmers, the 2025 rule represents a victory for property rights. The most significant shift is the adoption of a strict Relatively Permanent” standard. Federal jurisdiction is now limited to bodies of water that are standing or continuously flowing. This change explicitly excludes ephemeral features—those dry ditches and low spots that only carry water after rainfall. Previously, these features left producers vulnerable to heavy fines; today, they are firmly outside federal reach.

To account for regional differences, the rule introduces a “Wet Season” definition. While waters that flow predictably during wetter months may still be regulated, the rule requires a continuous surface connection to navigable waters. If a feature does not maintain water during the defined regional wet season, the federal government has no authority over it.

The 2025 reforms also strengthened essential exclusions. For the first time, groundwater and subsurface tile lines are explicitly excluded by rule, ensuring that vital drainage infrastructure remains a private management matter. Furthermore, Prior Converted Cropland status was simplified: land only loses its exclusion if it is abandoned for more than five years and reverts to a wetland state.

The public comment period on the proposed rule closed in early January of 2026. The agencies are reviewing the submitted comments and are working on the drafting of the final rule, which is expected to be issued sometime in the Spring or Summer of 2026.

WOTUS Comparison: 2023 vs. 2025

FeatureAmended 2023 RuleNov. 2025 Proposed Rule
Primary Standard“Relatively Permanent” but undefinedDefined: Flowing/standing year-round or during a predictable “Wet Season.”
Ephemeral StreamsCase-by-case (often regulated)Explicitly Excluded: Land that only flows after rain is non-jurisdictional.
WetlandsMust have a surface connectionTwo-Prong Test: Must (1) touch a WOTUS and (2) have surface water during the wet season.
GroundwaterGenerally excluded by practiceExplicitly Excluded by Rule: Includes tile drains and subsurface systems.
Interstate WatersRegulated because they cross linesRemoved: Must independently meet the permanence standard to be regulated.

Related Stories
Mike Wilson says years of hard work and stewardship helped transform the farm for future generations.
Farm Bureau Economist Dr. Faith Parum joins us to break down what year-round E15 passage could mean for agriculture, energy markets, and the future of renewable fuels in the United States.
A tax preparer can help identify penalty and interest charges and determine whether Form 843 should be filed.
The longtime extension leader and former state senator says agriculture continues shaping his work and values.
Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition joins us to discuss the proposed federal gas tax suspension, fuel cost pressures, and what the policy could mean for agriculture and transportation.
Agri Stats would no longer be allowed to show participant lists, rankings, or “flags,” and it could only report individual company data in narrow situations.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

RFD-TV Farm Accounting & Tax expert Roger McEowen discusses crucial legal and tax issues for farmers and ranchers to manage operational risks in this Firm to Farm blog post.
RFD-TV ag legal expert Roger McEowen examines common issues facing farmers, ranchers, and rural landowners: SAF fuel, R&D credit, drones, and cleaning fencerows.
Right-to-Farm Law Inapplicable when Farming Operation Not in Compliance with State Law – All of It
Agricultural law and taxation expert Roger McEowen discusses issues facing farmers and ranchers, like self-defense, Good Samaritan laws, preparing for the exit, and cleaning out fencerows.
When you work on your estate plan, RFD-TV’s farm legal and tax expert Roger McEowen recommends preparing a vital list of information for whoever will need it.
In today’s Firm to Farm blog post, RFD-TV ag law expert Roger McEowen briefly examines several of the issues that farmers and ranchers face.