Firm to Farm: Antitrust Issues in Agriculture — The “Top 10” Agricultural Law and Tax Developments of 2025

From “right to repair” to investigations into the “Big Four” meatpackers, antitrust issues were a major legal topic in 2025 and promise to have a long-term impact on the agriculture industry in the future.

farmer repairing a vintage blue tractor at sunset_Photo by greenoline via AdobeStock_264429398.jpg

Photo by greenoline via Adobe Stock

2025 proved to be a watershed moment for agriculture, marked by a decisive shift away from corporate consolidation and toward the protection of individual farmers. From the right-to-repair movement to settlements in the meatpacking industry, the legal landscape appeared to favor market competition and producer autonomy.

A central pillar of this shift occurred in June 2025, when a federal judge ordered John Deere to face a major antitrust lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).[1] The court’s rejection of Deere’s motion to dismiss signals a critical turning point; it challenges the company’s exclusive control over diagnostic software, which critics argue created an illegal monopoly on repairs.

Building on this judicial momentum, the FARM Act[2] was introduced in late 2025. This federal legislation aims to codify a farmer’s right to bypass authorized dealerships in favor of independent mechanics. With a “repair gap” estimated to cost farmers more than $3 billion annually, this act seeks to restore equipment ownership from a restricted license to a full property right.

In 2025, federal courts also address long-standing allegations of price and wage manipulation in the meatpacking industry. In August, JBS received final approval for an $83.5 million settlement regarding allegations that the “Big Four” packers conspired to suppress cattle prices by artificially limiting supply. By November, a global settlement totaling nearly $400 million was finalized against major processors like Tyson and Perdue. This case focused on “wage-fixing” schemes facilitated by Agri Stats, a data-sharing firm that, in October, agreed to cease sharing sensitive plant-level wage data.

There was also significant litigation in the broiler industry concerning a conspiracy to fix prices by “bid rigging.” [3]

The year concluded with a dramatic escalation in December, when a new Executive Order established task forces within the DOJ and FTC. These teams are specifically tasked with investigating “foreign-controlled” food supply chains, targeting both meat-processing and agricultural-equipment sectors.

Source Cases:
[1] FTC v. Deere & Co., No. 25-CV50017 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 9, 2025).
[2] Freedom From Agricultural Repair and Maintenance Act, H.R. 5857 and S. 3549, introduced Oct. 28, 2025.
[3] In re Broiler Chicken Grower Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 3167, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 260867 (Jud. Panel on MDL Dec. 16 (2025).

Related Stories: Firm to Farm
RFD-TV Farm Legal Expert Roger McEowen joins us to discuss QTIP trusts, farm succession challenges, and business planning strategies for ensuring smooth transitions in agricultural operations.
To preserve their property rights, farmers and ranchers must understand the procedural tactics of federal enforcement and take proactive steps to document the visual realities of their land.
Agricultural property presents unique opportunities for scammers to impersonate landowners and attempt to sell rural property they do not own. And in many cases, they are getting dangerously close to succeeding.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Producers should coordinate immediately with their CPA and legal counsel to ensure their corporate structures and operational realities are perfectly aligned before the September deadline.
Passing a farming operation to the next generation causes incredibly complex challenges, so estate planners often use the QTIP Trust, a powerful estate-planning tool, to bridge the gap.
In agricultural transactions, timing is often far more than a matter of convenience. A delayed closing or missed payment can lead to a major financial problem.
Did the Kansas Court of Appeals Go Too Far in Clark v. McKee?
Balancing Regulatory Compliance and Economic Viability
The court’s decision to deny the defendant’s motion to exclude the expert’s testimony serves as a sharp reminder of the high burden required to exclude expert testimony, particularly in the agricultural context, where “experience” is often the currency of reliability.