Firm to Farm: Antitrust Issues in Agriculture — The “Top 10” Agricultural Law and Tax Developments of 2025

From “right to repair” to investigations into the “Big Four” meatpackers, antitrust issues were a major legal topic in 2025 and promise to have a long-term impact on the agriculture industry in the future.

farmer repairing a vintage blue tractor at sunset_Photo by greenoline via AdobeStock_264429398.jpg

Photo by greenoline via Adobe Stock

2025 proved to be a watershed moment for agriculture, marked by a decisive shift away from corporate consolidation and toward the protection of individual farmers. From the right-to-repair movement to settlements in the meatpacking industry, the legal landscape appeared to favor market competition and producer autonomy.

A central pillar of this shift occurred in June 2025, when a federal judge ordered John Deere to face a major antitrust lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).[1] The court’s rejection of Deere’s motion to dismiss signals a critical turning point; it challenges the company’s exclusive control over diagnostic software, which critics argue created an illegal monopoly on repairs.

Building on this judicial momentum, the FARM Act[2] was introduced in late 2025. This federal legislation aims to codify a farmer’s right to bypass authorized dealerships in favor of independent mechanics. With a “repair gap” estimated to cost farmers more than $3 billion annually, this act seeks to restore equipment ownership from a restricted license to a full property right.

In 2025, federal courts also address long-standing allegations of price and wage manipulation in the meatpacking industry. In August, JBS received final approval for an $83.5 million settlement regarding allegations that the “Big Four” packers conspired to suppress cattle prices by artificially limiting supply. By November, a global settlement totaling nearly $400 million was finalized against major processors like Tyson and Perdue. This case focused on “wage-fixing” schemes facilitated by Agri Stats, a data-sharing firm that, in October, agreed to cease sharing sensitive plant-level wage data.

There was also significant litigation in the broiler industry concerning a conspiracy to fix prices by “bid rigging.” [3]

The year concluded with a dramatic escalation in December, when a new Executive Order established task forces within the DOJ and FTC. These teams are specifically tasked with investigating “foreign-controlled” food supply chains, targeting both meat-processing and agricultural-equipment sectors.

Source Cases:
[1] FTC v. Deere & Co., No. 25-CV50017 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 9, 2025).
[2] Freedom From Agricultural Repair and Maintenance Act, H.R. 5857 and S. 3549, introduced Oct. 28, 2025.
[3] In re Broiler Chicken Grower Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 3167, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 260867 (Jud. Panel on MDL Dec. 16 (2025).

Related Stories: Firm to Farm
How the Public Trust Doctrine Threatens Agricultural Property Rights
Last year was a busy year for pesticide litigation in the United States. At No. 10, it kicks off RFD-TV Legal Expert Roger McEowen’s list of the “Top 10” Agricultural Law and Tax Developments of 2025.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

A high-stakes legal case in a South Dakota federal court concerning misleading country-of-origin labeling (MCOOL), such as “Product of the USA,” on food products, will significantly impact U.S. agricultural policy for years to come.
On a spreadsheet, it looks like the ultimate way to harvest extra profit. But in the eyes of the IRS—as RFD-TV Farm Legal & Tax Expert Roger McEowen explains—this “tax-free” bank can quickly turn into a field full of weeds.
In Minnesota, a legal and legislative battle has reached a tipping point. For over a decade, the state’s Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the private deer-farming industry have been locked in a dispute over the management of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD).
The specific provision in the CO₂ storage law allowed the North Dakota Industrial Commission (NDIC) to authorize carbon storage projects to proceed even if they lacked unanimous consent from all affected landowners.
Low-risk credit farming is not a technique; it is a culture of financial discipline. It requires the same level of expertise in the farm office as it does in the field.