Firm to Farm: Common Estate Planning Mistakes for Farmers

Avoid these common estate planning mistakes to protect your hard-earned legacy as a farmer or rancher from RFD-TV Ag Legal and Tax Expert Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law.

asset-title-estate-planning-law_adobe-stock.png

Adobe Stock

What are some common mistakes that farmers and ranchers often overlook regarding estate planning? Don’t let these critical errors jeopardize the future of your hard-earned legacy.

RFD-TV Ag Legal and Tax Expert Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law complied a list of the most common mistakes he sees farmers and ranchers make when it comes to estate planning:

Common Estate Planning Mistakes of Farmers

  • NOT ensuring property title ownership complies with your overall estate planning goals and objectives. This includes the proper use of jointly held property, IRAs, and other documents that have beneficiary designations.
  • NOT knowing what the language in a deed means for purposes of passage of the property at death.
  • NOT leaving everything outright to a surviving spouse when the family wealth is potentially subject to federal estate tax.
  • Thinking that “fair” means “equal.” If you have both “on-farm” and “off-farm” heirs, the control of the family business should pass to the “on-farm” heirs, and the “off-farm” heirs should get an income interest that is roughly balanced in value to that of the “on-farm” heirs’ control interest. Leaving the farm to all the kids equally is rarely a good idea in that situation.
  • Letting tax issues drive the process.
  • NOT preserving records and key documents in a secure place where the people who will need to find them know where they are.
  • And NOT routinely reviewing your plan. Life events may have changed your goals or objectives.

Conclusion

I could list more, but these are some big ones. Try to avoid these mistakes with your estate plan.

Recent Posts by Roger McEowen

Read more of Roger McEowen’s thoughts on agricultural law and policy issues that matter to farmers and ranchers on his RFD Business Blog, Firm to Farm.

USDA’s Harvest Fuel Relief Program could provide short-term assistance to farmers, but ranchers await clarity on payments for fuel, feed, and cattle hauling.
A recent decision from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas addresses an important question: Can a farmer modify a confirmed Chapter 12 plan to extend payments on secured debt beyond five years from the date the first payment under the original plan was due?
Roger McEowen examines how President Trump’s federal diesel tax relief differs from state rules and what Kansas farmers should consider before using dyed diesel on roads.

For more expert farm legal and tax tips, subscribe to Roger’s personal Substack blog:

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Paulette Wooten and Kim Hill bring their voices together on “How Did We Get Here.”
The shipment would mark the first Russian petroleum-products cargo the United States has imported since a 2022 ban on Russian oil and petroleum products.
Higher shipping costs could make U.S. grain less competitive overseas.
Slower exports and stronger foreign competition are weighing on the U.S. pork sector.
More soybeans are being processed domestically as renewable fuels drive demand for soybean oil.
USDA’s new regional cattle report could give producers a clearer view of cash prices as negotiated trade continues to shrink.
Countries that buy American cotton could receive favorable tariff treatment on qualifying apparel.
New and expanded rail lines could give Brazilian soybean and corn exports a stronger cost advantage.
Barge traffic improved, but grain movement continues to face higher transportation costs during harvest.
Temporary policy changes could help ease fuel costs while refineries get back on track. RFD-TV Markets Specialist Tony St. James dug into U.S. policy and found four wildcard ideas that might work.
Open cotton remains vulnerable to rain and severe weather as High Plains growers weigh harvest costs and abandonment.
Lower tariffs could improve U.S. competitiveness, but the framework does not guarantee Chinese purchases.