Firm to Farm: The Rise of ‘Lawfare’ in Agriculture — The Top 10 Ag Law and Tax Developments of 2025

Roger McEowen explains the concept of “lawfare” — the use of legal systems to intimidate or financially exhaust an opponent — which grew into a central theme of U.S. ag law in 2025.

Justice with grain fields behind

Photo by Rosso and fotoinfot via Adobe Stock

In 2025, the concept of “lawfare” (the use of legal systems to intimidate or financially exhaust an opponent) became a central theme in American agriculture. The most prominent example of this trend was the federal prosecution of Charles and Heather Maude, fifth-generation ranchers in South Dakota. In 2024, the Maudes were indicted on federal felony charges of “theft of government property.”

The case centered on a 75-year-old fence line and a 25-acre parcel of the Buffalo Gap National Grasslands. The Maudes had managed the land cooperatively with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) for decades, and the fence in question had been recognized in every permit renewal since the 1950s.

Rather than a civil boundary adjustment, the government pursued criminal indictments. Armed federal agents served the couple, who were charged separately, forcing them to hire individual attorneys and effectively doubling their legal costs.

Following a massive public outcry and a change in federal administration, the charges were dropped in April 2025. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins labeled the case “government regulation by prosecution” and a “politically motivated witch hunt.”

The Maude case exposed a “chilling effect” on ranchers who rely on federal grazing permits. To prevent future lawfare, the USDA launched a “Lawfare Complaint Portal” in late 2025, allowing producers to report similar instances of overzealous enforcement.

By the end of 2025, the portal had already received hundreds of submissions. Many of these reports echo the Maudes’ experience – minor civil boundary or grazing disputes that were escalated into felony criminal cases by federal agencies.

Additionally, the newly formed Farmers First Lawfare Advisory Council began monitoring cases involving eminent domain and environmental mandates. These developments signal a shift in 2026 toward protecting individual property rights over the administrative convenience of federal agencies.

The fallout from these developments has led to a major reorganization of the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and other land management agencies.

In June 2025, the USDA rescinded the 2001 Roadless Rule,[1] a move intended to restore local control and reduce the regulatory burden on nearly 59 million acres of forest and grasslands.

[1] 90 FR 42179.

Related Stories: Firm to Farm
For producers, success this season will require more than just a clean field; it will require meticulous record-keeping, a proactive written mitigation plan, and a constant eye on both the forecast and the federal docket.
Farm legal expert Roger McEowen discusses a new rail antitrust case in Kansas and its potential implications for farmers as rail upgrades signal continued export-driven demand for logistics.
Roger McEowen of Washburn University School of Law joined us to discuss key legal and tax issues ranchers should consider as they recover from recent prairie fires across the Southern Plains.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

The most common mistake farmers make is waiting until a health crisis occurs to transfer the farm to their children.
For the broader agricultural industry, a railroad antitrust case in Kansas could lead to the dismantling of legacy regulatory shields, creating a more fluid, market-driven transportation grid that prioritizes moving crops efficiently over protecting historic rail monopolies.
The long-term viability of a ranching operation often hinges on how effectively its owners navigate the overlapping layers of IRS regulations, state tax incentives, and USDA disaster programs.
Formally dubbed “Farm Bill 2.0” by committee leadership, the draft surfaces after a high-stakes legislative dance that saw much of the traditional farm bill’s funding, specifically for crop insurance and safety net programs, carved out and passed in last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA).
A transition from traditional, technology-specific subsidies toward a performance-based, technology-neutral framework
The biggest development of 2025 in agricultural law and taxation was the signing into law on July 4 of the Trump Administration’s landmark legislation, the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act (OBBBA)