Firm to Farm: The Rise of ‘Lawfare’ in Agriculture — The Top 10 Ag Law and Tax Developments of 2025

Roger McEowen explains the concept of “lawfare” — the use of legal systems to intimidate or financially exhaust an opponent — which grew into a central theme of U.S. ag law in 2025.

Justice with grain fields behind

Photo by Rosso and fotoinfot via Adobe Stock

In 2025, the concept of “lawfare” (the use of legal systems to intimidate or financially exhaust an opponent) became a central theme in American agriculture. The most prominent example of this trend was the federal prosecution of Charles and Heather Maude, fifth-generation ranchers in South Dakota. In 2024, the Maudes were indicted on federal felony charges of “theft of government property.”

The case centered on a 75-year-old fence line and a 25-acre parcel of the Buffalo Gap National Grasslands. The Maudes had managed the land cooperatively with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) for decades, and the fence in question had been recognized in every permit renewal since the 1950s.

Rather than a civil boundary adjustment, the government pursued criminal indictments. Armed federal agents served the couple, who were charged separately, forcing them to hire individual attorneys and effectively doubling their legal costs.

Following a massive public outcry and a change in federal administration, the charges were dropped in April 2025. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins labeled the case “government regulation by prosecution” and a “politically motivated witch hunt.”

The Maude case exposed a “chilling effect” on ranchers who rely on federal grazing permits. To prevent future lawfare, the USDA launched a “Lawfare Complaint Portal” in late 2025, allowing producers to report similar instances of overzealous enforcement.

By the end of 2025, the portal had already received hundreds of submissions. Many of these reports echo the Maudes’ experience – minor civil boundary or grazing disputes that were escalated into felony criminal cases by federal agencies.

Additionally, the newly formed Farmers First Lawfare Advisory Council began monitoring cases involving eminent domain and environmental mandates. These developments signal a shift in 2026 toward protecting individual property rights over the administrative convenience of federal agencies.

The fallout from these developments has led to a major reorganization of the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and other land management agencies.

In June 2025, the USDA rescinded the 2001 Roadless Rule,[1] a move intended to restore local control and reduce the regulatory burden on nearly 59 million acres of forest and grasslands.

[1] 90 FR 42179.

Related Stories: Firm to Farm
What are some common mistakes that farmers and ranchers make regarding estate planning? Here are a few key ideas to consider from RFD-TV Ag Legal and Tax Expert Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law.
RFD-TV Farm Accounting & Tax expert Roger McEowen discusses crucial legal and tax issues for farmers and ranchers to manage operational risks in this Firm to Farm blog post.
RFD-TV ag legal expert Roger McEowen examines common issues facing farmers, ranchers, and rural landowners: SAF fuel, R&D credit, drones, and cleaning fencerows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Today’s blog post by RFD-TV Agri-Legal Expert Roger McEowen takes a look at the “preferential payment rule,” a unique bankruptcy provision that can come as a suprise to farmers in financial distress.
The meaning of a “double-fraction” clause and the impact on future oil and gas conveyances—that is the topic of today’s blog post by RFD-TV Agril-Legal expert Roger McEowen.
In today’s blog post by RFD-TV agri-legal expert Roger A. McEowen tackles the task of building a solid hunting use agreement.
Acquiring farm or ranch land, as well as the key concepts and issues are the topics of today’s blog post by RFD-TV Agri-legal Expert Roger McEowen.
With 2023 projected to be a difficult year for agricultural producers, Chapter 12 filings may increase. One of the requirements to get a Chapter 12 reorganization plan approved is that be filed in “good faith.” In this blog post, RFD-TV Legal Contributor Roger A. McEowen explains exactly what farmers need to know about the process.
The failure of a grain elevator can cause large problems for farmers and for the local community it serves. A farmer who knows their rights and where they stand if an elevator fails can be in a better position than those farmers who aren’t as well informed. That is the topic of today’s blog post by RFD-TV Legal Contributor Roger A. McEowen.