Cargill-Union Meeting Set As Labor Lockout Puts Beef-Processing Reliability in Focus

The lockout has not yet signaled a major disruption in the cattle market, but processing reliability remains important in a tight beef supply chain.

FORT MORGAN, CO (RFD NEWS) —A labor dispute at Cargill’s Fort Morgan, Colorado, beef plant remains a market watch point because the facility is a major processor in a tight cattle supply environment. The lockout began May 20 after union-represented employees rejected the company’s latest contract proposal.

Teamsters Local 455 says more than 1,700 workers are seeking better wages, health care, and safety protections. Cargill says its offer included bonuses, predictable wage increases, retirement provisions, and an estimated $33.4 million in employee investment over five years.

Workers at the Cargill facility are critical to processing millions of pounds of beef for American families nationwide. According to the Teamsters, in a town as small and tight-knit as Fort Morgan, Cargill Teamsters keep the economy running.

“I’ve been at Cargill for 33 years, and it’s really upsetting to see the company be so unreasonable,” said Chris Bell, a maintenance worker at Cargill and member of Local 455. “I am just a few months away from retirement, but I want to be out here supporting the younger workers who are fighting for their future. We can’t believe this company would stoop to this level. We will be out here every day making our voices heard.”

Cargill says it initiated the lockout to avoid a sudden work stoppage during live-animal processing, citing food safety, animal welfare, and food-waste concerns. To avoid supply chain disruptions, the company says cattle scheduled for Fort Morgan have been redirected to other Cargill facilities in Dodge City, Kansas; Schuyler, Nebraska; and Friona, Texas.

The dispute comes as Cargill has invested in automation, employee housing, and yield technology at Fort Morgan.

A Cargill representative provided the following statement to RFD NEWS:

“We can confirm that Cargill initiated a lockout on May 20, 2026, at our Fort Morgan, Colorado, beef facility following months of bargaining and an employee vote against the latest contract offer.

“This was a difficult decision and not the outcome we wanted. We believe our proposal is fair and competitive, representing an estimated $33.4 million investment over five years. While negotiations continue, we remain focused on safety, responsible operations, and serving customers through Cargill’s broader supply chain network. Under current plans, we do not expect material impacts to producers or customers.

“The lockout was initiated because continued uncertainty around a potential work stoppage creates challenges to operating safely, responsibly, and reliably. We respect employees’ right to vote and remain committed to reaching a ratified agreement with the union.”

Cargill Media Relations

Both parties report ongoing negotiations with ongoing impacts to workers, cattle suppliers, customers, and the Fort Morgan community.

Cargill issued an updated https://www.cargill.com/page/fort-morgan-labor-updatesstatement on Friday morning, saying that a meeting between company and union officials has been set for Wednesday, May 27:

“Our goal remains to reach an agreement that allows the facility to return to normal operations safely and productively as soon as possible. After the union contacted us on May 20, we worked with them to schedule additional bargaining and are now set to meet on May 27. As we have told the union, we remain open to reviewing any counterproposals they bring forward and would welcome a joint meeting with a mediator.

“In the meantime, we are using our broader supply chain network to help minimize disruption and continue serving customers.”

Cargill Media Relations

The next read on the U.S. cattle industry will be the USDA’s next Cattle on Feed Report, slated for release on Friday, May 22, at 3 p.m. ET.

Related Stories
Superior Livestock Auctions markets more than 1.7 million head of cattle nationwide while also building long-term relationships between both cattle raisers and beef producers.
The proposal would require farmers’ consent before companies can sell agricultural data
Lane Howard and Adam Andrews with the National Corn Growers Association joined us in the studio discuss EPA’s approval of summer E15 sales, ongoing fuel market concerns, and the industry’s push for a long-term biofuels solution for farmers.
Alan Bjerga with the National Milk Producers Federation discusses how stewardship is driving efficiency, profitability, and competitiveness in the dairy industry.
Texas continues to play a critical role in the U.S. beef supply chain, with both cow-calf operations and feedlots contributing significantly to national production.
Farm Bureau officials say the findings underscore mounting pressure on producers heading into the 2026 growing season, with input costs continuing to outpace farm income.
Corey Rosenbusch with The Fertilizer Institute joined us to discuss supply chain disruptions and what farmers should watch as global tensions impact fertilizer markets.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

USDA Cattle-on-Feed report for March shows slightly lower inventory and higher February placements, signaling a tighter supply but steady outlook for the U.S. cattle herd.
Energy risks could reshape global ag trade flows.
The ag trade deficit is narrowing, but export competition remains strong.
E15 policy could shape future corn demand outlook.
Agricultural groups warn that the deal could limit competition and raise transportation costs for farmers
The Trump Administration’s new rule limiting CDL renewals for immigrant truckers is seeing mixed reactions in agriculture. While some support the change, it is raising concerns about higher freight costs and impacts on U.S. grain export competitiveness.