China Signals Doubt on Meeting U.S. Soybean Commitments

China’s cost advantage with Brazilian soybeans and vague public messaging leave U.S. export prospects uncertain heading into winter.

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (RFD-TV) — China’s soybean buying remains far weaker than Washington’s expectations, despite political assurances made after last month’s Trump–Xi meeting.

Retired USDA economist Dr. Fred Gale notes that China’s Ministry of Commerce refused this week to confirm the White House’s claim that Beijing would buy 12 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans before year-end and 25 million tons annually from 2026–28. Instead, the spokesman delivered a broad statement about “cooperative trade,” avoiding any mention of soybeans — a move mirrored across Chinese media outlets that repeated the non-answer without clarifying China’s intent.

Market behavior continues to contradict diplomatic language. China has imported nearly 96 mmt of soybeans so far in 2025, but only 16.8 mmt from the U.S., making the promised 12 mmt surge before year-end increasingly implausible.

Prices remain the most significant obstacle: U.S. soybeans still face a 13 percent tariff, compared with 3 percent for Brazilian beans, and delivered-to-port prices (the bean plus freight) show Brazilian soybeans running roughly $60–$70 per ton cheaper than U.S. shipments. That advantage is shaping buying patterns. COFCO made a few symbolic purchases around the Trump–Xi meeting, but China simultaneously signed a 20-mmt agreement with Brazil at the Shanghai Import Expo and has not deployed Sinograin — its reserve buyer — to procure U.S. supplies.

Record port stocks, weak crushing margins, and slow feed demand add to the drag. Analysts say China is unlikely to buy large volumes until margins improve — and even then, Brazil remains the cheaper, higher-priority origin.

Farm-Level Takeaway: China’s cost advantage with Brazilian soybeans and vague public messaging leave U.S. export prospects uncertain heading into winter.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
Related Stories
Brandy Carroll with the Arkansas Farm Bureau shares an update on planting conditions and what producers are facing this season.
RealAg Radio host Shaun Haney explains shifting global trade dynamics and what they could mean for agriculture and energy markets.
Rising diesel and energy costs are squeezing farmers and rural communities, increasing production expenses and raising concerns about consumer demand for beef even as U.S. meat exports regain the Australian market.
Rising input costs may squeeze margins and shift planting decisions. Scott Metzger with the American Soybean Association discusses fertilizer market pressures and what is at stake for farmers as planting season ramps up.
Shaun Haney with Real Ag Radio joined us to break down the USMCA review and what Canadian producers and exporters should be watching in the months ahead.
Fertilizer relief may be limited despite the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz this week. AgriSompo’s Brooks York discusses marketing strategies, crop insurance considerations, and other tips for producers navigating volatility this planting season.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Roger McEowen joins us to explain the USDA appeals process and how farmers should navigate adverse decisions and crop insurance disputes.
EPA’s approval gives citrus growers a new disease-fighting tool against greening at a time when production losses remain severe.
Higher input costs are making flexible marketing plans and updated break-even targets more important.
Data center growth can bring opportunities, but competition for land, water, and power will matter more in rural areas.
Rail rulings, export terminal access, and equipment rules are becoming bigger factors in grain shipping costs and reliability.
Higher ocean freight rates can add export cost pressure even when grain demand remains active.