Higher Truck Weight Limits Could Boost Ag Efficiency Under New Federal Pilot Proposal

Soy Transportation Coalition’s Mike Steenhoek discusses the proposed six-axle truck pilot program and its potential impacts on agriculture and freight transportation.

semi truck driving into camera at sunset_Photo by helivideo via AdobeStock_292464872.png

Photo by helivideo via Adobe Stock

ANKENY, IOWA (RFD NEWS) — America’s trucking fleet could soon see changes in both efficiency and weight limits under a new amendment being discussed in Washington.

The BUILD America 250 Act would allow states to participate in a pilot program permitting six-axle trucks to operate at up to 91,000 pounds, up from the current federal standard of 80,000 pounds.

Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition joined us on Friday’s Market Day Report to discuss the proposal and what it could mean for agricultural transportation and freight movement across the country.

In his interview with RFD News, Steenhoek explained the details of the amendment and how the pilot program would operate, including which states could opt in and what types of vehicles would be eligible.

“Well, in most areas of the country, the federal interstate system caps the allowance for a semi-truck at 80,000 pounds, and that’s been in place since the early 1980s,” he explained. “A lot of states have higher allowances on their state and local systems, but the system is mostly capped at 80,000 pounds.

He also addressed potential impacts on the agricultural supply chain, including fuel savings and, for farmers, cost reductions due to increased payload capacity on overall transportation costs.

“A big discussion we’re having as a country is that we’re all experiencing high fuel costs,” Steenhoek said. “More and more of our budget is being allocated to the price at the pump, and we’re looking for ways to provide some degree of relief for fuel costs in this area of elevated prices. And this is one way of doing that—allow states to have six-axle, 91,000-pound semis operate on the interstate system.”

For grain transportation, a major draw is improved efficiency. Steenhoek explains that an additional axle allows trucks to carry more weight while also providing more consistent levels of wear and tear.

“That additional axle is very important because it displaces the weight over more tires or wheels, so that the imprint on the road and wear and tear is actually the same or less,” he noted. “That additional axle also provides more stopping and braking capacity, so stopping distances are slightly less than a five-axle 80,000-pound semi. Of course, it increases efficiency, and it saves costs for a typical grain elevator. You can save about $44,000 a year just in fuel costs by going to this approach. It reduces carbon emissions, so there are significant benefits.”

In addition, Steenhoek discussed safety concerns raised by critics, including roadway wear and public safety, while also weighing how the proposal could help address ongoing truck driver shortages and improve logistics efficiency for ag shippers. He shared feedback he’s hearing from both truckers and agricultural stakeholders, as well as how industry groups are reacting to the potential change.

“Yeah, that’s one of the big arguments against it — but with that additional axle, you’re actually reducing stopping distances,” he noted. “One of the biggest contributing factors to motorist safety is the number of semis a motorist will encounter versus the weight of those semis. A typical grain elevator, if you went to a six-axle, 91,000-pound configuration, that results in 838 fewer trips, meaning fewer semis on the road. Reducing those trips clearly has a benefit on motor safety. So we think there’s a strong case not just for cost savings and efficiency gains, but also for motorist safety.”

Finally, Steenhoek addressed the broader outlook for the proposal’s likelihood of becoming reality and discussed next steps in the Surface Transportation Board’s review of the revised Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern merger application.

“So they’ve deemed the application acceptable, and now they can proceed with the review process. That was the first step—to determine if the application is complete. That does not grant approval of the merger itself,” he said. “This will now be at least a year-long process, probably longer, where the Surface Transportation Board reviews the transaction to determine whether they will approve or reject it. So, it’s a long process ahead of us.”

Related Stories
U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins joined us to discuss fertilizer markets, domestic supply efforts, trade priorities, and ongoing policy work aimed at stabilizing costs for U.S. farmers.
Louisiana State University Professor Shelly Pate Kerns says a late freeze forced widespread replanting of some crops across the state.
RealAg Radio’s Shaun Haney discusses the DOJ investigation into U.S. beef packers, concerns about cattle pricing, and ongoing trade and animal health issues affecting producers.
Event focuses on helping communities grow through local business
Rep. Dusty Johnson of South Dakota joined us to discuss rising input costs, proposed fertilizer legislation, and potential support for farmers navigating tight margins.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

In honor of Oral Cancer Awareness Month, Dr. Jeffrey Gold shares how disparities in dental care impact rural Americans and why early detection is important.
While the Farm Bill is top of mind right now, it is far from the only issue getting attention in Washington.
Lewie Pugh, with the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, discusses EPA DEF system changes and what they mean for the supply chain and fuel costs.
JBS says the plant is now operating at full capacity as plant workers return to work.
Rising costs and prices are shifting acreage toward soybeans. Most fertilizer prices are up double digits from this time last year, with Urea seeing the largest gains.
Industry leaders argue the decision could disrupt confidence in conservation practices and increase regulatory uncertainty for producers across the region.