Higher Truck Weight Limits Could Boost Ag Efficiency Under New Federal Pilot Proposal

Soy Transportation Coalition’s Mike Steenhoek discusses the proposed six-axle truck pilot program and its potential impacts on agriculture and freight transportation.

semi truck driving into camera at sunset_Photo by helivideo via AdobeStock_292464872.png

Photo by helivideo via Adobe Stock

ANKENY, IOWA (RFD NEWS) — America’s trucking fleet could soon see changes in both efficiency and weight limits under a new amendment being discussed in Washington.

The BUILD America 250 Act would allow states to participate in a pilot program permitting six-axle trucks to operate at up to 91,000 pounds, up from the current federal standard of 80,000 pounds.

Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition joined us on Friday’s Market Day Report to discuss the proposal and what it could mean for agricultural transportation and freight movement across the country.

In his interview with RFD News, Steenhoek explained the details of the amendment and how the pilot program would operate, including which states could opt in and what types of vehicles would be eligible.

“Well, in most areas of the country, the federal interstate system caps the allowance for a semi-truck at 80,000 pounds, and that’s been in place since the early 1980s,” he explained. “A lot of states have higher allowances on their state and local systems, but the system is mostly capped at 80,000 pounds.

He also addressed potential impacts on the agricultural supply chain, including fuel savings and, for farmers, cost reductions due to increased payload capacity on overall transportation costs.

“A big discussion we’re having as a country is that we’re all experiencing high fuel costs,” Steenhoek said. “More and more of our budget is being allocated to the price at the pump, and we’re looking for ways to provide some degree of relief for fuel costs in this area of elevated prices. And this is one way of doing that—allow states to have six-axle, 91,000-pound semis operate on the interstate system.”

For grain transportation, a major draw is improved efficiency. Steenhoek explains that an additional axle allows trucks to carry more weight while also providing more consistent levels of wear and tear.

“That additional axle is very important because it displaces the weight over more tires or wheels, so that the imprint on the road and wear and tear is actually the same or less,” he noted. “That additional axle also provides more stopping and braking capacity, so stopping distances are slightly less than a five-axle 80,000-pound semi. Of course, it increases efficiency, and it saves costs for a typical grain elevator. You can save about $44,000 a year just in fuel costs by going to this approach. It reduces carbon emissions, so there are significant benefits.”

In addition, Steenhoek discussed safety concerns raised by critics, including roadway wear and public safety, while also weighing how the proposal could help address ongoing truck driver shortages and improve logistics efficiency for ag shippers. He shared feedback he’s hearing from both truckers and agricultural stakeholders, as well as how industry groups are reacting to the potential change.

“Yeah, that’s one of the big arguments against it — but with that additional axle, you’re actually reducing stopping distances,” he noted. “One of the biggest contributing factors to motorist safety is the number of semis a motorist will encounter versus the weight of those semis. A typical grain elevator, if you went to a six-axle, 91,000-pound configuration, that results in 838 fewer trips, meaning fewer semis on the road. Reducing those trips clearly has a benefit on motor safety. So we think there’s a strong case not just for cost savings and efficiency gains, but also for motorist safety.”

Finally, Steenhoek addressed the broader outlook for the proposal’s likelihood of becoming reality and discussed next steps in the Surface Transportation Board’s review of the revised Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern merger application.

“So they’ve deemed the application acceptable, and now they can proceed with the review process. That was the first step—to determine if the application is complete. That does not grant approval of the merger itself,” he said. “This will now be at least a year-long process, probably longer, where the Surface Transportation Board reviews the transaction to determine whether they will approve or reject it. So, it’s a long process ahead of us.”

Related Stories
UNL student fellow Alison Walbrecht shares her perspective on building support for agricultural research, extension, and teaching while gaining hands-on insight into federal policymaking.
RealAg Radio host Shaun Haney explains how geopolitical developments in the Middle East can create energy-driven pressures that impact the supply chain and reshape demand for certain ag products.
National Pork Producers Council incoming president Rob Brenneman shares insights from the National Pork Industry Forum in Kansas City, where producers gathered to discuss Farm Bill policy, sustainability, and other priorities for the year ahead.
Strong exports and production support ongoing corn demand.
Brooks York with AgriSompo provide insight on crop insurance considerations and the decisions farmers are making as the enrollment deadline approaches.
Farm legal expert Roger McEowen discusses a new rail antitrust case in Kansas and its potential implications for farmers as rail upgrades signal continued export-driven demand for logistics.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

University of Arkansas’ Allen Szalanski discusses a news study on rice stink bugs, what it could mean for farmers, and pest management strategies for the future.
Weak crop margins and tariff uncertainty are delaying machinery purchases and signaling slower capital investment across U.S. agriculture.
Farm Bureau Economist Dr. Faith Parum explains the role farm safety net programs play in supporting farm finances as growers head into the 2026 planting season.
Corn demand is rising thanks to ethanol expansion, yet year-round E15 remains missing from the Farm Bill—leaving farmers questioning the policy gap.
Real Ag’s Shaun Haney explains how farmers are approaching risk management and the steps they’re taking to strengthen profitability through better financial planning.
Valley Irrigation’s Darren Siekman explains the advantages of their new pivots for growers managing acreages of up to 60 acres.