House Ag Democrats Push Farm and Family Relief Act as SNAP Cost Shift Raises Alarm

House Agriculture Committee Democrats are calling for action on the Farm and Family Relief Act, warning that proposed SNAP cost shifts to states could reduce food assistance for low-income families amid ongoing tariffs and trade disruptions that continue to strain U.S. farmers.

Shelly_Muzzall_01_21_19_USA_WA_Three_Sisters_Farm_012.jpg

3 Sisters Family Farm (FarmHER S4, Ep. 9)

FarmHer, Inc.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD NEWS) — House Agriculture Committee Democrats are renewing calls for congressional action on food assistance and farm policy, warning that proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and ongoing trade disruptions could harm both farmers and low-income families.

At a January press event, Ranking Member Angie Craig (D-MN) and other committee Democrats unveiled the framework of the Farm and Family Relief Act, legislation they say is designed to ease financial pressure on family farmers while protecting access to food assistance. Democrats argue that tariffs and trade uncertainty have contributed to significant losses in farm income, while recent SNAP policy changes risk shifting costs to states and reducing benefits for vulnerable populations.

“Americans know that life is simply more expensive today than when President Trump took office last year,” Craig said. “Family farmers have been bankrupted by Trump’s ill-conceived trade wars, and state governments are facing the terrifying reality that they may need to let millions of residents go hungry because of his heartless cuts to food assistance. The Farm and Family Relief Act doesn’t pick winners and losers. It helps all Americans by reigning in the tariffs that have increased our cost of living, giving states breathing room to adapt to shifting SNAP rules, and providing an economic lifeline to farmers so they can continue to feed our nation and the world. Unlike the Trump administration, which loves to pick winners and losers, the Farm and Family Relief Act has provisions that help all Americans – and only as a package can we deliver true relief to the American people.”

Those concerns are echoed in a new analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), which warns that a pending SNAP cost-sharing requirement would, for the first time, force states to pay a portion of food benefit costs beginning in 2027. The policy ties state costs to payment error rates, a move CBPP says could saddle many states with hundreds of millions of dollars in new expenses each year.

According to the report, states facing higher costs could be forced to cut SNAP benefits, limit eligibility, or divert funding from other essential services. CBPP is urging Congress to delay the cost shift, citing administrative challenges, disruptions from the recent government shutdown, and reduced federal support for SNAP operations.

Democrats say the Farm and Family Relief Act would provide flexibility for states, protect food assistance for children, seniors, and veterans, and help stabilize rural communities amid economic strain. Without action, they warn, both producers and consumers could feel the impact through higher costs and reduced access to food.

Related Stories
University of Nebraska President Dr. Jeffrey Gold joined us to share practical health and safety guidance for managing respiratory and skin health during the winter season.
Roger McEowen with the Washburn University School of Law joined us to provide legal analysis on key cases shaping the agricultural landscape heading into the year ahead.
RFD News correspondent Frank McCaffrey reports from Texas on the ongoing water dispute and its implications for U.S. farmers.
RealAg Radio host Shaun Haney discusses the latest developments in the Supreme Court, trade tariffs, and the future of the USMCA under President Donald Trump.
The American Farm Bureau Federation’s 2026 agenda centers on labor stability, biosecurity, and economic resilience for family farms. Expanded DMC coverage improves risk protection for dairy operations facing tighter margins.
A high-stakes legal case in a South Dakota federal court concerning misleading country-of-origin labeling (MCOOL), such as “Product of the USA,” on food products, will significantly impact U.S. agricultural policy for years to come.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Alan Bjerga with the National Milk Producers Federation joined us to review new policies and regulations supporting the dairy industry and what they mean for the year ahead.
Despite rising costs and growing food insecurity, meat demand remained strong in 2025 as higher-income consumers offset cutbacks elsewhere. Economists break down the K-shaped economy, upcoming USDA cattle reports, livestock production outlooks, and renewed debate over beef imports and country-of-origin labeling heading into 2026.
Corn growers are turning to ethanol, E15 expansion, and export markets to help absorb record supplies and stabilize prices. Farm leaders discuss low-carbon ethanol demand, flex-fuel vehicle challenges, input costs, and the role of USMCA as producers look for market relief in the year ahead.
From rising trade tensions in Europe to a pending Supreme Court decision on tariffs and shifting demand from China, global trade policy spearheaded by President Donald Trump continues to shape the outlook for U.S. agriculture—adding uncertainty as farmers navigate another volatile year.
The Surface Transportation Board rejects the proposed Norfolk Southern–Union Pacific merger, prompting concerns from agricultural shippers about rail consolidation, service reliability, and higher transportation costs.
Midland County Livestock Association President Brandon Mitchell reflects on another strong year for the event, including a premium sale that once again topped the million-dollar mark.