How are lawmakers and other countries responding to tariffs going into effect tomorrow?

Tariffs go into effect tomorrow for Mexico and Canada at 25 percent. President Trump is also eyeing an additional 10 percent tariff on Chinese imports, which is in addition to the 10 percent added early last month.

Canada and Mexico are both leading trade partners with the U.S., and officials to our North have been watching the situation closely. They say President Trump’s threats have caused big backlash, leading retailers there to already begin demanding more Canadian products.

“The demand that we are seeing, and I use the word demand deliberately because that’s what our members are getting from consumers. They’re not asking for more Canadian; they’re demanding more Canadian products,” said Gary Sands.

President Trump’s tariff plan has already been met with positive response from ag lawmakers. However, Washington Congresswoman Suzan Delbene warns farmers are in danger of being caugh in the middle.

“What is being done to protect farmers? Are we not concerned about the massive retaliation against our farmers that a trade war brings? It always impacts agriculture. Are my colleagues, my Republican colleagues, in particular, going to allow President Trump to raise taxes on the American people without a say?”

The White House sees it differently. Speaking to reporters recently from the Oval Office, the President’s economic team said they just want trade to be fair.

“We want trade to be fair. It turns out that Americans have been disadvantaged by foreign governments over and over, and President Trump wants it to stop. The fact that struck me as most noticeable when I started to look at what President Trump was asking us to do is that last year, U.S. companies paid $370 billion in taxes to foreign governments. Last year, foreign multinationals paid us $57 billion in taxes,” said Kevin Hassett.

President Trump has previously said tariffs could be lifted if the other countries take stronger action on drug smuggling and illegal immigration.

Related Stories
The proposal signals a renewed push to offset tariff-driven losses, stabilize nutrition programs, and broaden eligibility for farm aid, though its path forward will depend on congressional negotiations.
The application deadline is March 8, 2026. The 1890 National Scholars Program aims to encourage students at 1890 land-grant universities to pursue careers in food, agriculture, and natural resource sciences.
Soft equipment sales signal cautious farm spending as producers prioritize cash flow over expansion.
Wind repowering offers a rare opportunity to renegotiate outdated leases and improve long-term land income for landowners who act early.
Iowa Secretary of Agriculture Mike Naig discusses market conditions, policy priorities, and his outlook for agriculture moving forward.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

China’s beef policy risk stems from domestic volatility, making export demand inherently unstable. Jake Charleston with Specialty Risk Insurance offers his perspective on cattle markets, risk management, and producer sentiment.
USDA flash corn sales, Cattle on Feed and Inventory reports, and beef packer antitrust concerns dominate January agricultural market news.
U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins said permanent access to the higher ethanol blend would provide farmers with much-needed certainty while supporting domestic crop demand.
Food prices increased in December, but not as much as expected, according to the latest Consumer Price Index from the U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics.
Lewis Williamson with HTS Commodities joined us to provide analysis on the January WASDE report and expectations for grain markets going forward.
Market reaction was bearish for corn and soybeans, with analysts noting that abundant supplies amid tepid demand could keep price pressure on agricultural commodities.