Minnesota Deer Farming Dispute Could Soon Reach a Tipping Point

Concerns over Chronic Wasting Disease are fueling a long-standing legal battle between Minnesota regulators and deer farmers. The case could soon reach the state’s Supreme Court with broader implications for agriculture.

ST. PAUL, Minn. (RFD-TV) — A decade-long debate in Minnesota between the state’s Department of Natural Resources and the private deer farming industry is approaching a potential turning point, with concerns over Chronic Wasting Disease at the center of the dispute. Roger McEowen from the Washburn University School of Law joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report to provide legal context and insight into the ongoing conflict and what could come next.

In his interview with RFD-TV News, McEowen explained that the issue stems from the state’s efforts to control and prevent the spread of Chronic Wasting Disease, a fatal neurological illness affecting deer and other cervids. He discussed how those concerns have prompted increased state regulation and management proposals, including requirements that directly affect deer farmers.

McEowen also addressed the financial implications of those management strategies, particularly the costs associated with fencing and containment systems, noting that such infrastructure can be expensive for producers to install and maintain. He outlined how these costs have contributed to industry challenges.

Additionally, McEowen discussed the decline in the number of white-tailed deer farms operating in Minnesota in recent years, explaining how regulatory pressure and disease concerns have led some operations to exit the industry altogether.

The conversation also turned to the legal path forward, as the Minnesota Supreme Court could hear the case. McEowen explained what it could mean for the industry if the court declines to take it up and how existing rulings would stand in that scenario. Finally, he shared his perspective on whether the case outcome could have broader implications for agriculture beyond deer farming, particularly for how states regulate animal health and disease management across livestock industries.

Firm to Farm: A Property Rights Battle in Minnesota over Deer Farming and CWD

Related Stories
Experts say farmers and ethanol producers would benefit from a risk-based ILUC system that protects forests without relying on speculative modeling.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer explains the USDA’s Stage Two Supplemental Disaster Relief Program, including application details, deadlines, and guidance for rural producers.
Singer-songwriter Shea Fisher joined the program to discuss her latest projects and her appearance on the Dirt Diaries podcast.
CattleCon 2026 kicks off February 3 in Nashville. Kristin Torres with the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association joined RFD-TV to share more about what’s ahead at this year’s event.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Mike Steenhoek of the Soy Transportation Coalition discusses industry reactions to the proposed Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern merger, the Surface Transportation Board’s review process, and current conditions on the Mississippi River.
Richard Gupton of the Agricultural Retailers Association explains a new resource designed to help farmers comply with ESA-related pesticide label requirements.
Sen. Roger Marshall discusses the Senate’s unanimous passage of the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act and what expanded milk options could mean for students and dairy farmers. Industry groups say it is a win for student nutrition and dairy producers.
Crop producers face tightening credit and lower incomes, while strong cattle markets continue to stabilize finances in livestock-heavy regions.
Supplemental Disaster Relief Program Stage Two will disburse around $16 billion, approved by Congress last year. Sign-ups begin Monday, and producers have until April to return applications.
Removing the 40% duty sharply lowers U.S. beef import costs on beef, coffee, fertilizer and fruit, and restores Brazil’s competitiveness during a period of tight domestic supply.