New rules ban junk food ads in schools (2014)

Schools around the country will soon have to eliminate any posters or billboards advertising unhealthy snacks on campus.

school meal.jpg

Schools around the country will soon have to eliminate any posters or billboards advertising unhealthy snacks on campus.

The White House is banning junk food ads to build on new regulations setting sugar and fat limits for any food sold in schools.

The whole idea is if we don’t want our kids eating or drinking it, then we shouldn’t be advertising it to them either.

In Arlington County, Virginia, the school lunch is baked not fried. It also comes with fresh fruits and veggies.

Even the vending machines have gotten a makeover.

“We have had healthy foods in the vending machines for several years, but the vending machines used to say Coke, and Pepsi. Now, we’re advertising the healthy food that we are offering to the kids,” said Amy Maclosky, director for Food and Nutrition Services.

Arlington is already doing what the Obama administration is now requiring of schools nationwide -- eliminating any junk food ads on campus and only offering snacks that meet strict limits on calories, fat and sugar.

“If you can’t sell it, you really ought not to be able to market it,” said Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.

Vilsack announced the new regulations with first lady Michelle Obama.

“These changes will shape their habits and tastes for the rest of their lives,” said Obama.

Her “Let’s Move Campaign” is celebrating its fourth year fighting childhood obesity, in part through social media.

The American Beverage Association, with members like Pepsi and Coca-Cola, supports the new efforts. Even high school students are coming around.

“I think it is a good variety of healthy choices,” said freshman Michael Swingle.

The USDA is also expanding its school lunch program.

Starting this summer, schools with high poverty rates can give all students free breakfast and lunch.

Related Stories
Beef industry groups seem to agree — market-based pricing, not federal intervention, best supports rancher livelihoods and long-term beef supply stability.
Cattle groups say additional imports would offer little relief for consumers but could erode rancher confidence as the industry begins to rebuild herds.
Understanding how these tax provisions interact will be key for farmers planning long-term equipment purchases or transfers within the family.
The government shutdown has touched nearly every sector of the ag industry since it began, and now impacts are spilling over into dairy.
With China halting U.S. soybean purchases and talks tied to broader strategic issues, growers face renewed export uncertainty.
Talks highlight the widening role of agriculture in U.S.–India trade policy, though neither side appears ready for major concessions before tariff issues and oil imports are resolved.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Farm Journal Foundation Senior Policy Adviser Dr. Stephanie Mercier outlines new research on the top sixteen biosecurity threats in agriculture/
Rancher David Kroa of One Man Ranch joins us to share the story of his remarkable Shorthorn cow, Trish, who is beating the odds.
American Soybean Association President Caleb Ragland shares the soybean sector outlook following the announcement of farm aid to offset losses for U.S. row crop growers.
Tariff relief and new trade agreements may temper food costs by reducing import costs.
Lawmakers and experts react to the Administration’s long-awaited announcement of “bridge” aid to stabilize farms and offset 2025 losses until expanded safety-net programs begin in 2026.