NPPC Warns of Costly ‘Patchwork’ Laws from California’s Prop. 12

More than 100 pork producers traveled to Washington to meet with lawmakers and underscore the threat to small family farms.

WASHINGTON (RFD-TV) — The National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) is urging Congress to act as California’s Proposition 12 continues to impose costly burdens on pig farmers nationwide and set a precedent for conflicting state regulations.

More than 100 pork producers traveled to Washington to meet with lawmakers and underscore the threat to small family farms.

NPPC President-Elect Rob Brenneman joined us on Friday’s Market Day Report with his reactions. In his interview with RFD-TV’s own Suzanne Alexander, Brenneman talked about the impact that Prop-12 is having on pork producers as well as the industry, and whether the state regulation is driving up costs for consumers.

Brenneman also discussed the NPPC’s trip to Washington to discuss their concerns with Congressional representatives, how he felt the message was received, and any feedback or insight the industry group received from lawmakers. Lastly, he addressed what is at risk if Congress fails to act on the federal level.

Pork Pushes Back on Prop-12

While farmers’ top priority remains animal welfare and food safety, NPPC leaders warn that Prop. 12 stretches far beyond those issues, undermining the Constitution’s interstate commerce protections. The law requires out-of-state pork producers to comply with California-specific sow housing standards, despite 99.9% of U.S. sows being raised outside the state.

“In California, Prop. 12 wholly regulates out-of-state pork production,” NPPC noted in recent comments submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice and National Economic Council. “This makes it an extraterritorial regulation of the $27 billion interstate pork market—driving up costs for farmers and consumers alike.”

Ohio pig farmer and NPPC Vice President Pat Hord testified before the House Agriculture Committee in July, underscoring the uncertainty farmers face:

“Pork producers throughout the country have already collectively spent hundreds of millions of dollars converting existing structures or building new barns to continue selling pork in California. Whatever I do today could need to be changed when a new state decides they want a different housing standard. These are expensive changes, and some farmers may exit the business amid this uncertainty, which increases consolidation.”

NPPC President Duane Stateler, also an Ohio farmer, drew a comparison to home ownership:

“What if you built a brand-new house and followed every code, only to have another state later tell you your electrical work or driveway isn’t acceptable? That’s what pig farmers face every time a state passes an arbitrary law and we have to rebuild barns or lose business.”

The council warns that Prop. 12 has opened the door for other states to pass conflicting regulations, creating a patchwork of costly mandates for farmers while reducing competition and driving consolidation.

“The Supreme Court made clear the ball is in Congress’ court,” NPPC said. “We need lawmakers to act so America’s farms can stay in business and consumers can continue to access affordable pork.”

Related Stories
Roger McEowen with the Washburn University School of Law joined us to provide legal analysis on key cases shaping the agricultural landscape heading into the year ahead.
RFD News correspondent Frank McCaffrey reports from Texas on the ongoing water dispute and its implications for U.S. farmers.
RealAg Radio host Shaun Haney discusses the latest developments in the Supreme Court, trade tariffs, and the future of the USMCA under President Donald Trump.
The American Farm Bureau Federation’s 2026 agenda centers on labor stability, biosecurity, and economic resilience for family farms. Expanded DMC coverage improves risk protection for dairy operations facing tighter margins.
A high-stakes legal case in a South Dakota federal court concerning misleading country-of-origin labeling (MCOOL), such as “Product of the USA,” on food products, will significantly impact U.S. agricultural policy for years to come.
Agronomy experts explain why standing crop residue protects soil and reduces costs for crop growers, while shredding often yields little benefit at higher costs.
Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller today unveiled a bold plan to protect the nation’s prime farm and ranchland from the rapid spread of data centers.
Secretary Rollins also met with specialty crop producers at a local strawberry farm to discuss workforce needs and the Trump Administration’s recent wins related to significantly cutting the cost of H-2A labor for California farmers.
China’s beef policy risk stems from domestic volatility, making export demand inherently unstable. Jake Charleston with Specialty Risk Insurance offers his perspective on cattle markets, risk management, and producer sentiment.