Rail and Port Rules Reshape Export Shipping Access

Rail rulings, export terminal access, and equipment rules are becoming bigger factors in grain shipping costs and reliability.

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — Federal transportation decisions are influencing how grain reaches export markets. That matters because rail access, terminal service, and equipment availability can affect shipping speed, costs, and competitiveness for agricultural products.

The Surface Transportation Board approved Norfolk Southern’s control of the Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad, a 36-mile switching line serving the Port of Virginia. Regulators said the line must remain a neutral switching carrier operated on a uniform, cost-plus basis.

That ruling matters for grain exports. In 2025, the Port of Virginia handled 2.4 million metric tons of containerized grain exports, 5 percent above the prior 5-year average. The switching railroad also serves Perdue AgriBusiness’s Chesapeake export terminal, the only deepwater bulk grain terminal on the East Coast.

At the same time, BNSF sold new forward grain-train contracts at strong prices. In its first auction for yearlong direct destination train service, five contracts sold for a combined $3.1 million. Another 17 four-month contracts beginning in August sold for $4.5 million.

Agricultural groups also told the Federal Maritime Commission that ocean carriers’ chassis rules create delays, raise costs, and increase export risk when truckers and shippers cannot freely choose equipment.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Rail rulings, export terminal access, and equipment rules are becoming bigger factors in grain shipping costs and reliability.
Tony St. James, RFD News Markets Specialist
Related Stories
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer discusses how January’s WASDE report could impact ARC and PLC payments and updates on disaster relief programs as farmers navigate a challenging market environment.
Texas Commissioner of Agriculture Sid Miller joined us to discuss data center expansion, farmland preservation, rural economic impacts, and imminent cattle biosecurity concerns affecting agriculture today.
The Pennsylvania Farm Show continues through Saturday, wrapping up another successful year of celebrating agriculture in the Commonwealth.
Shaun Haney joined us to discuss Canada’s new trade agreement with China, the potential impact on farmers and exporters, and what it could mean for U.S.–Canada trade relations going forward.
National Corn Growers Association Chief Economist Krista Swanson discusses corn supply pressures, market fundamentals, policy considerations, and producer outlook for the year ahead.
The proposal signals a renewed push to offset tariff-driven losses, stabilize nutrition programs, and broaden eligibility for farm aid, though its path forward will depend on congressional negotiations.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

The ACRE Act modestly reduces farmland borrowing costs now, with more savings possible once federal guidance clarifies which loans qualify.
ARC-CO delivers the bulk of 2024 support, offering key margin relief as producers manage tight operating conditions.
Higher menu prices and tax-free tips are reshaping restaurant economics, sharply lifting server take-home pay even as diners face higher out-the-door costs.
USDA’s steady yields and heavy global stocks keep grains range-bound unless demand firms or South American weather becomes a real threat.
As economic pressures continue to squeeze agriculture, ag lenders are signaling a more cautious outlook for farm profitability heading into next year, particularly among grain producers facing lower commodity prices and higher operating costs.
China’s cost advantage with Brazilian soybeans and vague public messaging leave U.S. export prospects uncertain heading into winter.