Rebuilding U.S. Textiles Requires New Industrial Model to Compete with Synthetics

Rebuilding domestic textiles depends on automation and vertical integration, not tariffs or legacy manufacturing models.

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD NEWS) — Efforts to bring textile and apparel manufacturing back to the United States will fail if they rely on outdated models, according to textile executive Bob Antoshak, who argues the industry’s return depends on building something fundamentally different from what existed decades ago. Rising labor costs and global competition have permanently closed the door on labor-intensive mills, but they have not eliminated the opportunity for a modern, automated domestic industry.

Antoshak points to early investments in nearshoring and advanced manufacturing as evidence that the sector can re-emerge if it is highly automated, vertically integrated, and closely connected to consumer demand. These projects prioritize speed, flexibility, and control over low wages, enabling producers to respond more quickly to market shifts and supply disruptions.

He cautions that tariffs alone do not create an industrial strategy. Broad import duties raise costs across the supply chain, including machinery and equipment needed for automation, ultimately increasing expenses for domestic producers and consumers without meaningfully rebuilding capacity.

The viable path forward centers on full vertical integration — from fiber or yarn through finished goods — supported by significant capital investment, advanced robotics, digital planning, and real-time market feedback. This approach reduces dependence on fragmented global sourcing and strengthens supply chain resilience.

Antoshak argues the next U.S. textile sector will be smaller in workforce but higher in output, technologically driven, and built around transparent, distinctly American brand narratives rather than nostalgia.

Related Stories
Expanding supplies are weighing on global coffee and cocoa prices.
NMPF’s Alan Bjerga discusses pending trade agreements with Indonesia and Ecuador and how they will benefit U.S. dairy producers and improve overall global competitiveness of U.S. ag products.
Lewis Williamson with HTS Commodities discusses how tensions in the Middle East are impacting producer’s spring planting decisions.
Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition discusses supply chain disruptions, rising costs, and the potential impact on agriculture as farmers navigate ongoing global uncertainty.
Spring Fieldwork Expands Amid Mixed Weather Nationwide
American Soybean Association President Scott Metzger discusses his recent testimony before the Senate Ag Committee, key priorities for soy growers, and his outlook for farmers into spring planting.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Technology returns depend on management, not just adoption.
The sugar policy debate affects prices, trade, and farm stability.
Strong feedlot demand keeps beef-on-dairy calf premiums elevated.
Roger McEowen discusses how long-term healthcare costs for elderly Americans are reshaping estate-planning decisions for farm families and what producers should consider moving forward.
Farmer Jeffry Mitchell with the Mississippi Farm Bureau joins us for a spring planting update from the southeast region as drought, input costs, and fertilizer access complicate crop progress.
Cattle producers face mounting pressure as U.S.-Mexico trade talks resume, but expanding drought, rising input costs, and policy work to improve the long-term industry outlook.