Rebuilding U.S. Textiles Requires New Industrial Model to Compete with Synthetics

Rebuilding domestic textiles depends on automation and vertical integration, not tariffs or legacy manufacturing models.

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD NEWS) — Efforts to bring textile and apparel manufacturing back to the United States will fail if they rely on outdated models, according to textile executive Bob Antoshak, who argues the industry’s return depends on building something fundamentally different from what existed decades ago. Rising labor costs and global competition have permanently closed the door on labor-intensive mills, but they have not eliminated the opportunity for a modern, automated domestic industry.

Antoshak points to early investments in nearshoring and advanced manufacturing as evidence that the sector can re-emerge if it is highly automated, vertically integrated, and closely connected to consumer demand. These projects prioritize speed, flexibility, and control over low wages, enabling producers to respond more quickly to market shifts and supply disruptions.

He cautions that tariffs alone do not create an industrial strategy. Broad import duties raise costs across the supply chain, including machinery and equipment needed for automation, ultimately increasing expenses for domestic producers and consumers without meaningfully rebuilding capacity.

The viable path forward centers on full vertical integration — from fiber or yarn through finished goods — supported by significant capital investment, advanced robotics, digital planning, and real-time market feedback. This approach reduces dependence on fragmented global sourcing and strengthens supply chain resilience.

Antoshak argues the next U.S. textile sector will be smaller in workforce but higher in output, technologically driven, and built around transparent, distinctly American brand narratives rather than nostalgia.

Related Stories
Record ethanol demand continues supporting corn markets and rural economies.
Purdue University’s Dr. Michael Langemeier discusses the survey’s findings in February and broader signals in the months ahead.
China may no longer serve as a consistent anchor market for U.S. cotton exports. Lewis Williamson of HTS Commodities joined us to discuss the factors influencing planting decisions, river conditions, and what producers are considering as they finalize acreage plans for the season.
Weather Swings Shape Early Season Farm Conditions Nationwide
Dry conditions may tighten hay supplies before summer growth. John Mays of Central Life Sciences joined us to discuss the risks of extended grain storage, how quality can be affected over time, and what growers can do to protect their grain while waiting for market opportunities.
Crop value concentration keeps farm income tied closely to commodity price cycles.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Acre shifts reflect margins, costs, and market opportunities.
SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler breaks down the Grocery Guarantee Program, its goals for expanding farmer access to capital, and its potential impact on food production and prices.
Strong Easter demand supports protein and crop markets.
Lower shipping costs alone will not restore export competitiveness.
Rising fuel costs will soon increase grain transportation expenses.
The USDA’s upcoming reports will drop on Tuesday afternoon, giving the trade real results on acreage shifts, drought concerns, and ongoing trade tensions, adding uncertainty for U.S. farmers.