LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD-TV) — Farmers weighing whether to claim a residual fertility deduction face a growing number of legal and tax risks, according to guidance from Tiffany Lashmet, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Ag Law Specialist.
The deduction — historically used to expense unexhausted fertilizer embedded in purchased farmland — has expanded in recent years to include much broader claims tied to the full nutrient content of soils. Lashmet cautions that these newer approaches lack clear legal support and may expose producers to IRS scrutiny.
At the core of the issue is Section 180 of the Internal Revenue Code, which allows farmers to deduct the cost of fertilizer, lime, and similar materials in the year they are applied. For decades, some farmland buyers have allocated a portion of the land purchase price to unexhausted fertilizer applied by prior owners. While no statute or court case explicitly endorses this, a 1991 IRS technical memo outlined conditions under which such a deduction may be permitted. Producers must prove the presence and amount of prior fertilizer, show that it is being depleted, and demonstrate beneficial ownership — meaning the nutrients are inseparable from the land they now farm.
Problems arise when deductions go beyond unexhausted fertilizer to include general soil nutrients or inflated values tied to basic soil composition. Lashmet notes that courts have repeatedly rejected attempts to depreciate soil itself or claim depletion of inherent soil nutrients. Because Section 180 applies only to added fertilizer, claims tied to naturally occurring fertility or long-ago application histories fall well outside the law’s scope.
For producers considering the deduction, documentation is critical. Claims tied to older land purchases, unfertilized pasture, or broad nutrient profiles are especially vulnerable. Lashmet urges farmers and land buyers to work closely with qualified tax professionals and understand the IRS burden of proof before proceeding.
Farm-Level Takeaway: Only properly documented, unexhausted fertilizer applied by prior owners may qualify for Section 180 expensing; broader nutrient-based claims carry significant legal and tax risk.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
It started as a simple service project for 4-H — collect some shoes, help a few people. But for Franklin Parish High School senior Eli Rogers, it has turned into something much bigger.
November 06, 2025 12:15 PM
·
Global nitrogen and phosphate prices remain high despite improved supply fundamentals, with limited Chinese exports and stronger fall applications tightening availability.
November 06, 2025 11:16 AM
·
RFD-TV expert Roger McEowen explains why a “skinny” Farm Bill is likely in the future, but its scope may change due to provisions contained in the Big, Beautiful Bill.
November 05, 2025 03:19 PM
·
David Klein with the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers (ASFMRA) shares an end-of-harvest update and a peek at the farmland market in Central Illinois.
November 05, 2025 12:58 PM
·
Host of
RealAg Radio Shaun Haney discusses how the proposed reductions to agriculture programs in Canada’s new budget could affect research and support programs that farmers need.
November 05, 2025 12:40 PM
·
RFD-TV’s farm legal expert, Roger McEowen, digs into the details of both the LRP and the LGM programs, two essential risk management tools for cattle producers.
November 04, 2025 10:34 AM
·
USDA will meet part of November SNAP benefits under court direction, citing insufficient funds for full payments.
November 04, 2025 10:20 AM
·
According to the new report, seven out of ten rural bankers support President Trump’s recent trade steps with China, expressing cautious optimism about future export potential.
November 03, 2025 01:36 PM
·
China’s grain expansion model may be hitting its limit. Lower prices, high rents, and policy fatigue threaten future output — with ripple effects across global feed and oilseed markets.
November 02, 2025 05:06 AM
·
