Study: Crop Insurance Greatly Reduces Revenue Risk

Crop insurance remains a vital tool for managing climate-driven risk.

agricultural land affected by flooding crop insurance_Photo By Andrii Yalanskyi via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo By Andrii Yalanskyi via Adobe Stock

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD-TV)New research from North Dakota State University highlights the role of crop insurance in shielding farmers from revenue losses between 2015 and 2023.

Led by Senior Research Economist Francis Tsiboe, the study found that combining basic insurance products, such as Revenue Protection (RP) and Yield Protection (YP), with supplemental policies, including the Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO) and Enhanced Coverage Option (ECO), significantly boosted revenue stability.

Farmers using these combined programs had a 27.9 percent higher chance of recovering losses compared to those farming without insurance. Revenue variability dropped by nearly half, while downside risk fell by more than 80 percent.

Cotton saw the highest reduction in downside revenue risk at 88 percent, followed by corn, canola, and wheat. Geographically, states like Arizona, Iowa, and Illinois reported the strongest protections, while regions such as Arkansas and California saw more modest benefits.

The study also noted that the strongest protections often came with higher producer costs, though recent legislation in the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) increased premium subsidies for SCO and ECO to 80 percent, easing the out-of-pocket burden for farmers.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Crop insurance remains a vital tool for managing climate-driven risk. Supplemental policies can significantly reduce revenue volatility, with expanded subsidies making them more accessible and affordable for producers nationwide.

Related Stories
U.S. sugar producers and processors should brace for price pressure and challenging export logistics with global sugar supply ramping up — driven by Brazil, India, and Thailand — especially at the raw processing level.
Retail competition and improved supplies are helping offset food inflation, pushing Thanksgiving meal costs modestly lower despite higher prices for beef, eggs, and dairy.
Only properly documented, unexhausted fertilizer applied by prior owners may qualify for Section 180 expensing; broader nutrient-based claims carry significant legal and tax risk.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Supplemental Disaster Relief Program Stage Two will disburse around $16 billion, approved by Congress last year. Sign-ups begin Monday, and producers have until April to return applications.
Early Cattle-on-Feed estimates point to slightly tighter cattle supplies, reinforcing the need to monitor prices and timing for winter marketing.
Removing the 40% duty sharply lowers U.S. beef import costs on beef, coffee, fertilizer and fruit, and restores Brazil’s competitiveness during a period of tight domestic supply.
Row crop losses in 2025 are outpacing last year. With no disaster aid yet approved, many operations face a tough financial bridge to 2026 even as Farm Bill improvements remain a year away.
Experts say farmers and ethanol producers would benefit from a risk-based ILUC system that protects forests without relying on speculative modeling.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer explains the USDA’s Stage Two Supplemental Disaster Relief Program, including application details, deadlines, and guidance for rural producers.