Study: Crop Insurance Greatly Reduces Revenue Risk

Crop insurance remains a vital tool for managing climate-driven risk.

agricultural land affected by flooding crop insurance_Photo By Andrii Yalanskyi via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo By Andrii Yalanskyi via Adobe Stock

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD-TV)New research from North Dakota State University highlights the role of crop insurance in shielding farmers from revenue losses between 2015 and 2023.

Led by Senior Research Economist Francis Tsiboe, the study found that combining basic insurance products, such as Revenue Protection (RP) and Yield Protection (YP), with supplemental policies, including the Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO) and Enhanced Coverage Option (ECO), significantly boosted revenue stability.

Farmers using these combined programs had a 27.9 percent higher chance of recovering losses compared to those farming without insurance. Revenue variability dropped by nearly half, while downside risk fell by more than 80 percent.

Cotton saw the highest reduction in downside revenue risk at 88 percent, followed by corn, canola, and wheat. Geographically, states like Arizona, Iowa, and Illinois reported the strongest protections, while regions such as Arkansas and California saw more modest benefits.

The study also noted that the strongest protections often came with higher producer costs, though recent legislation in the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) increased premium subsidies for SCO and ECO to 80 percent, easing the out-of-pocket burden for farmers.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Crop insurance remains a vital tool for managing climate-driven risk. Supplemental policies can significantly reduce revenue volatility, with expanded subsidies making them more accessible and affordable for producers nationwide.

Related Stories
Payment totals alone do not show financial stress — production costs and net losses complete the picture.
Seasonal price patterns can inform soybean marketing timing, particularly when harvest prices appear unusually strong or weak.
The idea of buying more beef from Argentina does not sit well with much of farm country, raising some questions from analysts and producers.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Long-term demand uncertainty is reshaping specialty crop strategies as producers adapt to fewer, older consumers.
Seasonal boxed beef softness does not change the tight-supply outlook — leverage remains closer to the farm gate heading into 2026.
FarmHER Nikki Boxler, aka The Maple Farmer, blends tradition with innovation, tapping into a bold new future for maple syrup.
As the new year begins, both farmers and rural families are taking stock of their finances and planning ahead for 2026.
Trade uncertainty—especially regarding soybeans—continues to weigh on future outlooks, even as farm finances and land values remain resilient.
Strong export demand supports feed grain prices, but drought risk and seasonal patterns favor disciplined early-year marketing.