Tariff Revenue Debate Raises Questions for Farmers

Tariff revenues rarely flow directly back to farmers.

frozen funds usda money farm programs_Photo by ivandanru via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo by ivandanru via Adobe Stock

Adobe Stock

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD NEWS) — Questions are growing about how tariff revenue is used and whether farmers benefit, as trade policy again reshapes agricultural markets and federal spending priorities.

Dr. Bart Fischer of the Agricultural and Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University notes tariff revenue flows through longstanding statutory channels rooted in the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1935. Section 32 requires 30 percent of customs duties to be directed toward agricultural priorities, including export promotion, domestic consumption support, and the restoration of farmers’ purchasing power.

Tariff collections have climbed sharply. Customs duties rose from $34.6 billion in 2017 to $70.8 billion in 2019, and the Congressional Budget Office projects duties could jump from $77 billion in 2024 to about $418 billion by 2026 under expanded tariff use.

In practice, most Section 32 funds support nutrition programs rather than direct farm payments. USDA retains limited authority for commodity purchases and assistance, while appropriations rules cap farmer-directed support at roughly $350 million in carryover funds annually — a small share if 2026 projections hold.

The structure leaves policymakers relying on tools like Commodity Credit Corporation programs for farm relief despite rising tariff revenues.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Tariff revenues rarely flow directly back to farmers.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist
Related Stories
The Senate failed to pass a continuing resolution that had been approved by the House the previous week. They could take it up again today, but it would take seven democrats to end the stalemate.
Livestock and government payments provide a boost, but crop receipts and rising expenses keep pressure on margins. Strong financial planning remains key in a volatile environment.
“Those could’ve easily been our beans going over there. It goes to show that if that opportunity is there, China would be willing to buy.”
Missouri Director of Agriculture Chris Chinn joined us Monday to share highlights from Secretary Brooke Rollins’ visit and her perspective on USDA’s new initiatives.
RFD-TV Farm Legal and Taxation expert, Roger McEowen, with the Washburn School of Law, joined us Monday to break down the changes and explain what producers should know.
North Dakota Farmers Union (NDFU) President Mark Watne joined us Monday to share his perspective on the America First Trade Promotion Program and potential implications for producers.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Lewis Williamson with HTS Commodities discusses how tensions in the Middle East are impacting producer’s spring planting decisions.
Land values remain key to borrowing strength.
Mike Steenhoek with the Soy Transportation Coalition discusses supply chain disruptions, rising costs, and the potential impact on agriculture as farmers navigate ongoing global uncertainty.
Strong exports support ethanol margins and corn demand.
Export competition remains heavy despite solid trade.
Spring Fieldwork Expands Amid Mixed Weather Nationwide